More Significant Misrepresentations from Kathleen Seidel

Once again, Neurodiversity's Kathleen Seidel has demonstrated her complete devotion to harming autistic children. She pointed out in her latest deranged attack on the Geier's that they have applied for a patent to treat children who have been poisoned by mercury. Seidel finds fault with this patent because the Geier's and a drug company will profit from it.
Seidel neglects to point out that the patent application does not mention treating children for precocious puberty. This had been her main complaint, insinuating that the Geier's were illegally diagnosing children to hoodwink insurance companies into paying for the procedure. Here, it seems that the Geier's are applying for a patent that will allow them to treat mercury poisoning for what it is so that affected children should be able to have the treatment paid for by insurance without any game playing about the diagnosis.
The Geier's have done what is best to help suffering children. The patent should assure that other doctors who administer this treatment will do so correctly and will not harm children by guessing about the procedure. Evidence presented by the Geier's suggests that the use of Lupron does indeed speed up chelation. As a parent who has struggled through two years of chelation therapy for my son, I can testify that the gains are very slow to arrive. Nevertheless, as I pointed out in my previous post about my sons steps to recovery, the gains do materialize.
It is interesting that the Geier's relate almost immediate improvement with gastrointestinal problems in one of their patients following the use of Lupron. My son suffered with severe and painful constipation for 4 or 5 years before chelation resolved that issue. Constipation was the first physical symptom that accompanied his autism to be resolved with the administration of chelation. To resolve this in a matter of hours versus months is what I consider great progress. It does not make sense for any parent of an autistic child to oppose this advancement in treating this debilitating condition.
As a parent of a severely autistic boy, my concern is for my son's return to the health and mental capacity with which he was born. I, and many other parents, can testify that our normal children were transformed into shells of themselves. Dr Mark Geier proved that the reason for this transformation was the injection of too much mercury via vaccines. I, and many other parents, are offering further proof of that discovery by watching our children return to normalcy by removing that mercury by chelation.
Seidel should have kept her mouth shut this time. The information she has provided offer proof that Dr Geier is doing another wonderful service for autistic children by patenting his discovery and giving parents an option that might bring their children back from the abyss of autism sooner while having this treatment properly recognized so that insurance companies will be forced to pay for it.
This patent may come back to slap the drug company by virtue of the fact that the insurance companies who will have to pay the bill may be able to turn around and sue the drug companies for their negligence in creating the autism epidemic. If insurance has to pay the bill, they should certainly be entitled to sue for all the malpractice that has been committed since Verstraeten informed us that mercury had caused the epidemic in 1999. The fact that Pharma ignored this information and negligently continued to cause autism and related disorders should make them liable for the cost of reversing the damage they knowingly caused. Perhaps Mr Frist has already taken this into account and protected Pharma from this lawsuit in waiting. If not, I'm sure he will.
Thanks for the information, Kathleen. Maybe next time, you can learn how to interpret it correctly. By the way, have you found any 76 year old autistics yet?