Saturday, April 28, 2007

Quackbusters Masquerading as Parents

Somebody claiming to be Stephen Barrett commented on my post yesterday. So, I clicked on his name to see where it led and wound up at Barrett's site. I don't know why I didn't figure this out a long time ago. Barrett has links to Autism Diva, Seidel and some jerk who calls himself Bartholemew Cubbins as well as David Gorski, AKA Orac.

Barrett also has links to sites that are not recommended which include ACHAMP, GR, Safe Minds, NAA, MAM, NoMercury, etc.. It looks like this jackass is the source from which all of the Neurodiverse nitwits draw their ammunition to bash parents who want to help their poisoned kids.

Tim Bolen tells us that the nitwit, Barrett is engaged in all of this propaganda to get rid of alternative medicine, thus making more money for mainstream doctors who poison babies. That makes sense. It certainly makes a lot more sense than some crazed parent claiming that curing an autistic child is akin to killing the kid.

I wonder if Estee Klar is paid by Barrett to go on TV and talk about the Joy of autism. Enquiring minds want to know Estee, are you a dumb blond or just playing a role for Barrett? What about Joseph, where did he disappear to? I hear that Barrett may be moving his operation out of the country because of his legal problems. Is Joseph the quackbuster tasked with making that happen? Maybe Joseph is Barrett and has gone into hiding. He had no sense of humor at all about the last entries I made to his blog. Of course, I could be mistaken and Joe might be conjuring up some new scheme to convince parents to let their kids rot in the hell of autism. His crap about curing a kid being akin to killing the kid only went over well with the Neurodiversity cult members, those super naive people who fell for this quackbuster crap disguised as something that was good for autistic people.

The quackbusters are being hunted now. That explains all of the anonymity. Criminals of this sort can't be called cowards for hiding their personal information. That's just being a smart criminal. What asshole who harms autistic people wants to get caight?

Now that the connection to quackbusters is apparent, I wonder what will become of Amanda Baggs. Will Kathleen Seidel keep up the charade of being a concerned parent of a kid with ASD instead of the ruthless cutthroat bitch who does character assassination on good scientists? Will Kathleen go out of her way to check up on poor Amanda? Will Amanda revert to being an acid using schizophrenic now that her fraud has been exposed? Or, will she decide to remain autistic to collect benefits? Will that nitwit lawyer,(I forgot her name) leave Droopy alone? Will Droopy help prosecute Baggs, I hope she has the tapes that disappeared from Youtube.

What about David Andrews? Does anyone think old Sanity Pending is one of the quackbusters or was he just a dupe? I don't think professional child abusers associated with quackbusters would put BA Pending after their name and tell everyone where they lived and went to school. No, they'd be more like Prometheus and NotMercury. They'd hide their identities well.

I wonder how long these assholes of Neurodiversity will try to keep up their charade now that I found their connection to the slimeball, Barrett. Will they explain to the poor young men and women with Asperger's how they used them, as I've been trying to point out for so long? Let's see if any more of the Autism Hub bloggers disappear like Joseph did.

What about Leitch? It's hard to imagine that any smart insiders with the quackbusters would include a dope like him in their inner circle. They probably just spotted how gullible he was and sucked him into doing the computer work to put the Autism Hub together. Maybe I'm giving the quackbusters too much credit though and Leitch is one of their leaders, who knows.

Maybe I'll write some more about these quackbusters but, for now, I'm content that I found the connection. There had to be some evil behind the charade of parents intentionally harmimg autistic children with their deranged rhetoric. Now, Neurodiversity makes some sense to me.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Does Neurodiversity Equal Quackbusters?

Scroll down to the part called How the Scam Works after clicking on the quackbusters link.. Doesn't this sound exactly like Neurodiversity? This is too similar to just be a coincidence.

I hope all of the people associated with Neuroinsanity will read this. It just points out what I've been telling you all along. Your leaders are simply a sham and are using you to help Pharma and mainstream medicine increase profits. These maggots couldn't care less about you or autistic rights. It's high time you folks with Asperger's woke up and stopped these bastards from using you to increase their profits. Any Autism Hub bloggers with half a brain who are not paid members of Quackbusters should quit the Hub right now, consult Generation Rescue and publicly denounce the Neurodiversity leaders.

I can only guess at who the anonymous or pseudonymous shills are. My best guess would be that it's the ones who won't publish any of my comments. That includes Kathleen, Kev, Kristina, Diva, DoC, Michelle, Amanda Baggs, along with Prometheus and Orac when they can't come up with an argument to refute what I have to say. While Joseph usually publishes my comments, that's only because he mistakenly thinks he's smarter than me. He's also, by far, the smartest of the Neurodiverse which makes me think he could only be a shill. My opinion on Estee Klar is that it's a tossup whether she's really as dumb as she acts and is a well meaning mother or that she is simply playing the role of the dumb blond with some bit of education.

Tim Bolen tells us this about Quackbusters: "It's sole purpose is to discredit, and suppress, in an "anything goes" attack mode, what is wrongfully named "Alternative Medicine." It has declared war on reality." I hope the innocent victims associated with the Autism Hub are paying attention. What fits in with this better than Kathleen's attacks on parents who are simply trying to help their children? Why do Diva and Kevin relentlessly bash parents who are desperate to save their kids?
Why would any parent bash another parent for helping a child? One thing you can be certain of is that the truth about autism will be the worst black eye the medical profession has ever had. They are going to great lengths to avoid it. Having their blogs show up on page one of most searches shows they are accomplishing their goal.

I can only guess about whether or not Neurodiversity is really Quackbusters. I don't have the resources to track down these idiots and have them investigated. It does make sense though, all the anonymous twerps calling anyone who helps an autistic child a quack, the personal attacks on scientists and parents. Why didn't we hear any of this nonsense until a couple of years ago? One would think that a sect of crazed parents would have sprung up long before that if these nitwits were really who they claim to be. There can't really be any people who celebrate having a child afflicted with autism.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Neurodiversity Credibility Check
Here's the link to the nitwit's blog. This time, she's knocking some doctor who practices chelation, presumably to warn people that he might be dangerous because of some problems he had in the past. She may have a point about the guy disagreeing with supplementing minerals.

The lack of credibility, however, is incredibly obvious by the fact that Mrs Nitwit doesn't bother to direct the reader to places where they can learn safe and effective chelation. We know she is aware of these places with all the muckraking she does by infesting these lists where she doesn't belong. It seems the credible thing to do would be to help out the reader with her vast knowledge of safe chelation protocols. But, unfortunately, someone who seems to exist for the sole purpose of preventing autistic children from being helped wouldn't do that, would they.

Mrs Nitwit is also good enough to try to do some character assassination on a couple of intelligent parents who try to help children by finding a way to asociate them with this doctor.

What would a reasonable person try to do when discovering a chelation protocol that might not be the best? Perhaps they would suggest that our government or the AMA arrange to meet with the leaders in the field and find a consensus on lessons learned. This might serve to standardize the procedure while making it safer and more effective for the children. Someone who would rather see the kids suffer wouldn't publicize this thought if it dawned on her empty head. She'd be more content to stupidly bash anyone who helps an autistic child to satisfy whatever deranged notion is dancing around in her scrambled brain.

Once again Mrs Nitwit, thank you for demonstrating the insanity of Neurodiversity.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Why Did Cho Do It?

We heard that Cho had autism from his aunt. Then that comment disappeared. We heard that Cho was bullied. We heard he was a loner who didn't even speak or make eye contact with his room mates. There was the comment that autism brought shame on the family in Korean culture. Who knows what to make of his rant about wealthy people? The isolation and loneliness he endured probably played some nasty tricks with his sanity.

All of this is relevant if one wants to dwell on minutiae. All of it sets the stage for his explosion. We who endure autism every damn day know the ultimate reason for this manifestation of a ruined life.

Publicizing the ultimate reason for this explosion is the only thing that can prevent it from happening again. I'm sick of all the comments claiming that identifying Cho as autistic will make it harder for kids with autism. Problems are not solved by hiding information. People who are strange don't have friends and no ammount of societal do-gooding is going to change that.

If Cho was autistic, I want to see it publicized. I want it to be well known what mercury does to brains. The ultimate cause of this horror began in 1931 when Eli Lilly started poisoning people with thimerosal. The fact that the media removed that comment from Cho's aunt just says that the media is hiding autism from intense scrutiny. Intense scrutiny of the ultimate reason for this horror might produce the truth for the whole world to see. We don't know if Cho was poisoned by mercury like my son was. Does anyone think that fact will be covered up if a tox screen reveals it? If Cho had thimerosal induced autism, the vaccine manufacturers and the medical profession must accept the blame for the lost lives. The truth is the only thing that can prevent more of the same.

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Amanda Baggs Lawyers Up

Above is the link to a letter from Neurodiverse nitwit lawyer, Anne Bevington to the autistic woman known as Droopy. It seems that Bevington thinks she can order Droopy to stop defending herself from Amanda Baggs' impersonation of her.

Bevington has gone as far as demanding that Droopy remove all anonymous comments from this blog that she thinks were put there by Droopy. I hope Droopy won't get in trouble with Bevington because anonymous comments can not be removed by the author. They can only be removed by the blog owner.

The problem here is, how is the blog owner supposed to know who put the anonymous comments here. Will I be reprimanded by this neurodiverse nitwit because I can't identify who posted certain coments? What if I believe Droopy and not Amanda (sham) Baggs? Can this lawyer force me to delete comments? That sounds like a free speech matter. I don't think lawyers have the authority to force anyone to do anything. Can she sue me for refusing to infringe on Droopy's right to free speech? I don't think so.

We have Amanda Baggs masquerading as a low functioning autistic person. If Amanda wants to take legal action based on that, it seems she would have to prove that she is, in fact, a low functioning autistic person. A low functioning autistic person might try to eat the keyboard upon which Baggs types 120 words per minute. I wonder if Baggs can work that into her role. Can she type and eat the keyboard simultaneously?

If low functioning autistic people knew how to call lawyers for help, they'd all be getting themselves off of Seroquel, Clonidine and other wonderful, mind-numbing drugs in favor of some DMSA and ALA, and getting themselves out of institutions. Does anyone think this nitwit, Bevington will help autistic kids with that? I doubt it. However, it's interesting that this associate of Kathleen Seidel's will initiate legal action against a true autistic woman. This is just more proof that Neurodiversity exists to harm autistic people.

That's my opinion of the whole thing, MS Bevington. Do you think silencing Droopy will stop anyone else from giving their opinion that Amanda Baggs is a sham?

Droopy, you're welcome to say whatever you want about Baggs here. That is, of course, unless MS Bevington can deny you you're free speech on a blog. This blog is written for an autistic person and, as such, will expose any scumbag who tries to harm any autistic person with blatant lies as Amanda Baggs chooses to do.

Amanda Baggs, MS Bevington, is harmful to all truly low functioning autistic people because she makes the general public think that autism is not nearly as horrible as it is. That lie that sways public opinion helps to prevent a majority of the public from becoming outraged at the atrocity that has been perpetrated on our babies. The fact that the general public is not outraged about this crime of negligence prevents people like my son from receiving all of the medical care that he needs to reverse the effect of that negligent poisoning. For assisting with this sham MS Bevington, I hope you die a slow, painful death and rot in Hell.

I also hope some decent lawyer who reads this will advise Droopy how to get this Neurodiverse nitwit, lawyer off her ass.

ADDENDUM: It looks like the nitwit lawyer has scared Droopy. All of her videos concerning Amanda (sham) Baggs are gone from Youtube. The nitwit can't erase our memories. We know what we saw and we know who is telling the truth. The scumbags at Neuroinsanity may have won a battle by intimidating an autistic woman. Their actions can't alter the truth.

Here's another video that the nitwits at Neuroinsanity will not like.
I wonder if a nitwit lawyer will demand that this be removed because it shows them for the idiots that they are with their deranged philosophy of wanting children to suffer for a lifetime instead of being helped.

Sunday, April 08, 2007

More Proof That Autism Is Mercury Poisoning

Autistics Clinically Proven Mercury Poisoned

Press Release Contact:

For Immediate Release CoMeD Director [Rev. Sykes (Richmond, VA)

April 8, 2007 CoMeD Sci. Advisor [Dr. King (Lake Hiawatha, NJ)

WASHINGTON, DC – Recent peer-reviewed scientific/medical studies by Nataf et al. (2006) and by Geier and Geier (2006) leave little doubt that many children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are indeed mercury poisoned. These studies utilized urinary porphyrin profile analysis (UPPA) to assess body-burden and physiological effects of mercury in autistics. Today, any parent, physician, or healthcare provider can easily confirm whether a non-chelated autistic is mercury poisoned by having UPPA testing run at Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp) (CLIA-certified, Test#120980) or Laboratoire Philippe Auguste (ISO-certified, Urine Porphyrin Profile).

UPPA is a highly accurate, inexpensive, non-invasive, and routinely available method for estimating body-burden and toxicity of mercury. Numerous peer-reviewed scientific/medical papers published over the past 40 years, many of them supported by the US NIH, have proven the validity of using UPPA to identify mercury poisoning.

UPPA profiling, unlike attempts to directly measure mercury in the blood, urine or feces, or in tissues (e.g., hair and nail), is a proven method for assessing mercury toxicity.

Using UPPA, Nataf et al. (2006) studied the urinary porphyrin patterns in French children using the results reported by Laboratoire Philippe Auguste. Similarly, Geier and Geier (2006) studied the urinary porphyrin patterns in US children using the results reported by LabCorp.

Both published studies:

· Clearly demonstrated that non-chelated autistics had porphyrin patterns indicative of clinical mercury toxicity, while normal children and their normal sibling controls did not.

· Found that the more severely affected the ASD children were the higher their evidence of mercury toxicity.

· Established that treating autistics with chelating agents resulted in lower mercury-specific urinary porphyrins, which corresponded to apparent reductions in the mercury body-burden of these children.

Many other physicians who take care of ASD patients have ordered UPPA testing and confirmed the observations made by Nataf et al. (2006) and Geier and Geier (2006).

Thus, urinary porphyrin profile testing is being successfully used to:

· Demonstrate the role of mercury in populations of autistics,

· Identify those children and adults who are mercury poisoned, and

· Track mercury excretion from affected children undergoing treatment.

For the past several years there has been a raging controversy as to whether or not mercury in medicines, especially in vaccines, has caused the dramatic rise in the rate of children diagnosed with an ASD. Many experts have insisted ASDs are caused by some yet-to-be-identified genetic cause. A paper recently published in Nature Genetics described the results of multi-million-dollar genetics study (which studied a thousand-plus families with at least two autistics using in-depth genetic screening). Tellingly, the authors reported, "None of our linkage results can be interpreted as `statistically significant'…" (The Autism Genome Project Consortium, 2007). This makes it unlikely that purely genetic aberrations are t he root cause of most ASD cases.

With the current porphyrin study results, public health officials should now publicly admit what they have been saying in their private transcripts and memos all along: Mercury from Thimerosal-containing vaccines and other medicines has been a major cause of ASD cases, which, according to recent CDC (2007) estimates, may occur one in every 150 children.

CoMeD's web site, contains:

· Further information on how to order these tests,

· Full copies of the Nataf et al. (2006) and Geier and Geier (2006) papers, and

· Some of the many published papers validating the UPPA test.