Monday, June 30, 2008

Ralph Nader, Just as Useless as McCain and Obama for Autistic Kids

I met with Ralph Nader a few weeks ago and talked to him about curing autism. He asked for my phone number, asked me to send him more information and said he'd be in touch to talk more about this. I have not heard back from Mr Nader and I'm not surprised.

I do continue to receive email from Nader asking me for money to finance his campaign. This guy claims to favor medical coverage for everyone but, as with McCain and Obama, that medical coverage will not include children who were poisoned into autism by the vaccine industry.

Nader mentions all sorts of things as issues on his website but the word "autism" is not there. Evidently, the fact that perfectly normal babies were turned into walking zombies by mercury in vaccines is not a big deal to Nader. Since this fact should be a big deal to every politician, we can safely assume that Nader, as with McCain and Obama, just does not have the guts to challenge the vaccine industry.

By refusing to mention autism, Nader has established himself as just another useless politician who will sweep our poisoned children under the rug. This guy claims to be against corporations sticking it to the general public but, through his silence about autism, has tacitly agreed that he favors the continued poisoning of babies worldwide.

I tried to explain to Mr Nader that there are at least 10 to 20 million voters who have family members affected by autism. For a guy who could certainly use those 10 to 20 million votes, one would think that would be motivation to publicize the fact that the vaccine industry continues the poisoning of babies. It would make sense for Nader to discuss the fact that we are curing some of those kids by removing the mercury that caused the autism.

Since it does not appear that Nader is financed by the vaccine industry, the only thing that makes sense to me is that he must be afraid the vaccine industry will assassinate him if he starts publicizing the truth about autism and vaccines. He's not afraid to berate the government on any other issue. You'd think he'd at least try to pander to those 20 million voters whose autistic relatives are suffering horribly. Nope, Nader won't even say the word "autism". He knows that if the vaccine industry can buy the other candidates, they can also buy a hitman to dispose of him if he exposes how babies are poisoned with mercury in vaccines.

So, as I saw Nader as our only hope of obtaining any help for our autistic kids, I guess there's, once again, no point in voting. It's just a waste of time. Bothering to vote for President only accomplishes one thing. It tells the corporations who buy your vote that you are stupid enough to believe their lies.

Friday, June 27, 2008

NH Senate Candidate Jeanne Shaheen, Let's Keep Poisoning Babies into Autism

I keep receiving letters from Jeanne Shaheen asking for my support. I keep writing back asking to talk to her about autism. The bitch never responds, except to flood my mailbox with more requests for help.

This ex governor wants us to believe she will be better than John Sununu who staunchly supports the vaccine manufacturers poisoning of our babies. One would think Mrs Shaheen would want to portray herself as a person who does not favor the worldwide poisoning of infants like Senators Gregg and Sununu from New Hampshire.

Since Mrs Shaheen will not say anything about autism, I'll have to assume she thinks she can just sweep the 4,000 autistic kids in New Hampshire under the rug and forget about them. Shaheen won't respond to my conerns about autism in private so I'll add her to list of elected scumbags who think it's a good idea to allow criminals in the pharmaceutical industry to poison babies into the nightmare of autism.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

David Kirby Asks for Difficult Questions

"I sincerely encourage any and all vaccine-autism skeptics, critics, agnostics and cynics living in the northeastern US to please consider attending one of these talks, armed with all of your most pointed, difficult and critical questions."
said David Kirby as he advertised his Northeast tour.

I suppose Kirby will make his usual claim that, maybe thimerosal caused some autism. This guy wrote a book and makes his living off of publicizing the horror of thimerosal induced autism but he just doesn't have the guts to state definitively what every parent knows who has watched their autistic kid get better by removing the damn mercury.

With his "maybe" statement as a fallback, the only tough question one could ask Kirby would be similar to asking him if it might rain tonight. Kirby would be sure to check with a meteorologist, ask for more testing of computer weather models and maybe be confident enough in his answer to tell you there's a 10% chance of rain.

Your lack of confidence in yourself is pathetic, David. Whether you like it or not, you are representing my son. You do not represent my son properly by giving any weight to any of the lies bandied about by the industry that poisoned him.

When questioned by any MD about the fact that thimerosal caused the autism epidemic, the proper reply is to first, ask how many babies they poisoned personally. Then you ask 200 pound MD's if they will accept an injection of 500 micrograms of mercury, directly into their brain to approximate the same effect thimerosal had on our 5 pound infants. Follow this up by asking how much money the damage to their reputations will cost them when parents don't bother with the stupid well baby visits. Then ask them about "standard of care" which protects them from lawsuits as long as it is standard medical practice to lie to parents anout thimerosal. Remind them that we know that if the majority of them tell the truth and advise parents to use chelation to remove the poison that they put into our kids, that that majority will alter the "standard of care" and they will all be open to lawsuits themselves rather than just the drug companies. Advise them that we already know the truth by virtue of some of us curing our autistic kids and let them know that the sooner they stop lying to us, the sooner they can begin to regain some respect.

You can't use these arguments, David if you're going to keep acting like a pansy and pretending you don't know the truth. You don't win debates by saying "maybe". You win debates by stating your position in no uncertain terms and using every available fact to refute the opposition.

When confronted by neuroinsane nitwits who tell you autism has always existed, your response is simple. You ask them to present 1 out of 150, 78 year olds who are feces smearing, non-verbal, illiterate, head bangers. If we don't obtain the funding and the publicity to have all of our kids treated biomedically, that's what the world will have to deal with about 50 years from now. Don't worry, the nitwits won't even be able to find one old person with Asperger's.

When the inevitable stupid question surfaces about thimerosal being removed in 2001, the correct response is not to claim that there are too many vaccines. The correct response is that the drug companies learned what we learned, that the largest increase in autism happened in 1994, exactly three years after they started using the HepB shot on the day of birth, before infants have developed a blood brain barrier. First, you correct them by telling them that thimerosal was not removed until 2003 from most vaccines. Then, you point out that giving pregnant women the flu shot with thimerosal has a much greater effect on a one pound fetus with a barely developing brain than the HepB shot did on full term infants. You also can insert the fact that having all those babies born with scrambled brains instead of regressing makes the naive parents believe that autism is genetic so they don't learn that their kids can be cured and they don't learn that they can sue the vaccine manufacturers. Are you getting this, David?

But, of course, the questions I would like to ask of you and Olmsted still remain. Why did you publicly support Kathleen Seidel who consistently lies about autism, thereby influencing public opinion against us obtaining the help we need to cure our kids and stop the poisoning of babies worldwide? When will it dawn on you that you have kicked every decent parent in the groin by publicly supporting this nefarious bitch? Why won't you or Olmsted answer that question, David? Will you answer that question for my son who you represent and who can't afford the treatment he needs? Do you think it is ethical to make your living off the back of my son while you misrepresent him in this cowardly fashion?

Saturday, June 07, 2008

Disgustingly Obese Neuronitwit Complains to Blogger, Amanda Baggs' Friend

Laura Tisoncik is trying some sneaky business to try to have this blog deleted. This disgustingly obese excuse for a human being has filed a complaint with Blogger, claiming that this blog is a hate site.

I'd like to take this opportunity to invite Tisoncik to show me exactly how curing autism equates to hate. That is the message of this blog, that autism is curable.

I do not take any grief from from fat lazy lesbians who promote ridiculous misinformation about autism. I will continue to expose Tisoncik and her associates for the frauds that they are. These child abusers will not interfere with sane people curing horribly disabled children.

While I'm on this subject of lying, useless idiots I see that Dave Seidel likes to post links to my address. Dave Seidel doesn't approve of people posting his friends' addresses and uses that to bash me. So, I just want to return the favor Dave and post your address:
Dave and Kathleen Seidel 68 Burke Road, Peterborough, NH, 03458

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Autism and Politics, Apology to NH State Rep's

I want to take this opportunity to apologize to some of the New Hampshire State Rep's whose names I included in another blog entry that I just took down. I called them all assholes because they didn't respond to my request to help with curing autism.

I met with eight of those representatives this morning, gave them some information about how we are curing autism and a copy of the Generation Rescue film "Autism Yesterday". They listened. Time will tell whether or not any positive result ensue.

I think it's worth mentioning here how my verbal thuggery proved useful. As we've seen for 10 long years, it has not done much good to ask for help politely. Since the media refuses to report the truth about how thimerosal caused the autism epidemic, it's up to us to take any and all measures to make sure the poisoning of babies by our vaccine industry ends.

My comrades in this battle who think they can gain anything by being politically correct really need to check the history books and learn what it took in the 1960's and '70's to effect change for Civil Rights and ending the Viet Nam War. None of that was accomplished by people being politically correct.