Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Obama Asks for Our Concerns Again

Another letter from Tom Daschle asks to hear our concerns. The more comments he hears, the more likely he is to listen.

Dear John,

Over the past two weeks, thousands of people representing all 50 states and every corner of the country have hosted health care discussions in their homes and communities. Just this week, I attended a discussion hosted by the Fire Department in Dublin, Indiana, and one hosted by a Senior Wellness Center in Southeast Washington, D.C.

Leading your discussion was the first step. Equally important, we want to hear back from you. I learned so much from attending discussions this week, and we want to know about your discussions, too.

The President-elect has asked me to share your feedback from these discussions -- that's why your submission is so essential.

Please tell us how your discussion went by visiting We need to hear from you as soon as possible -- by Sunday, January 4th, 2009 at the latest -- so we can prepare our report for the President-elect.

Both President-elect Obama and I are committed to reforming the health care system from the grassroots up -- and leaders like you are crucial to that effort.

I'm looking forward to reading your submissions about your Health Care Community Discussions.

Thank you,


Tom Daschle
Department of Health and Human Services

Please note that replies to this email will not be answered.

Monday, December 29, 2008

Ask Obama to Tell the Truth About Thimerosal has asked for questions for Obama. They claim they will answer them in the New Year. Please vote here for the following question. Go to the search bar, type in autism and you will find lots of questions. The Neuronitwits are hard at work flagging every suggestion to do with vaccines as a cause of autism as inappropriate, so it would be nice to counter their deranged attempt to harm our children.
"President Bush refused to tell the truth about how thimerosal causes autism.
Will you ban the use of thimerosal and tell the public the truth so we can begin curing all of these children who had their brains damaged by thimerosal in vaccines?"

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Pure Bullshit, Dr Rima Laibow, Lying Scoundrel

I received this pile of manure in an email from Dr Rima Laibow in which she tries to deny that she is a disinformation agent working against the best interests of children with autism. This is a lot of bullshit for a simple denial.

The fact remains that Dr Laibow is a lying piece of garbage.

Only a lying piece of garbage could possibly take such a strong stand against me for trying to post one simple link to a blog entry that I wrote advising people that voting for any incumbent politician for President was against their best interests. The worst that could have happened if I had been allowed to post that link on Dr Laibow's Yahoo group is that a handful of people might have looked at it. There is an even slimmer chance that my blog entry may have convinced anyone to change their mind a month before the election and vote against Obama and McCain.

So, no matter what Dr Laibow says in her defense, this proven liar is not to be believed. Dr Laibow would have us believe that she is looking out for our best interests by doing her thing with Codex Alimentarius to preserve our access to the vitamin supplements we need to help our autistic children. Yet, she adamantly refuses to allow me to post one bit of information that opposes the same politicians who will allow those supplements to be banned. By banning my opposition to those politicians, Dr Laibow, in essence took a stance in favor of banning those supplements and preventing us from curing our children of autism. By such vile action, Dr Rima Laibow advertised to the world that she is a lying scoundrel who is trying to harm our autistic children with her devious misinformation.
Here's some information on her husband, Gen Stubblebine.

And, here's my exchange of emails with the lying Dr Laibow where she now threatens to sue me:

No, you blogged disinformation which is actionable as both slander and liable. I am curious to know just what makes you think that what you have published IS the truth? Have you seen a single shred of information which substantiates a single one of those accusations? Please be advised that you might want to think again before you continue to present material which is, rather than the truth, blatant lies since that means that you, too, are engaging in slander and liable and are opening yourself to the same legal action that the perpetrators of these lies are. Before you make that mistake, why not write to the perpetrators and ask for the documentation that their absurd assertions rest upon. You will find that there are none.
I am so sorry that you have been misled by disinformation, but that is what has happened.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation

***Note here how Dr Laibow tries to avoid the fact that I determined she was a lying sack of dung because she refused to allow the truth about corrupt politicians to be published on her Yahoo group. Instead, she threatens to sue me about things other people wrote about her. This is a ploy used by liars all the time to avoid the truth about themselves.***

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 9:30 AM, wrote:

Thanks for your email. I blogged the truth about you. Fuck you.

I'll note here that every email I get from Dr Laibow begs for money and tries to sell me some coffee for $50 a pound. With Maxwell House costing me $2.99 a pound, Dr Laibows coffee seems a bit overpriced.

This is the piece that it appears the lying Dr Laibow is responding to:
Why does Dr. Rima Laibow use psychological warfare techniques?
<<< Back to Codex

When Dr. Rima Laibow first suddenly appeared on the anti-Codex landscape as leader of the newly-formed Natural Solutions Foundation, I began to wonder where she was coming from. Although she seemed to have a straightforward, hands-on approach to internet activism, something seemed to be amiss.

Long-term anti-Codex activist John Hammell had clearly identified the transnational treaties such as WTO, FTAA and CAFTA as integrating Codex language, placing jurisdiction outside of U.S. lawmakers. Yet Dr. Laibow not only ignored this connection, but actively dissuaded her growing community of online supporters from paying any attention to it, especially at the time when CAFTA was being debated in Congress and there was a real possibility of defeating it. (More on this dissuasion below.)

Then I learned that Dr. Laibow was suing Kevin Miller, allegedly for her having provided some funding for his brilliant and powerful video on Codex called “We Become Silent” but, apparently against her wishes, his including the connection to the above-mentioned treaties.

Since then she has engaged her online community in what appears to be a good cause - writing and calling Congress to stop BioShield 2, a truly horrific proposed law. But all discussion of Codex appears to be directing people into a useless diversion, writing and sending letters of “support” for an “alternative” to the Codex vitamin guidelines. We as ordinary people have zero impact on this process, since it is being drawn up by bureaucrats in the Codex delegations whose allegiance is primarily to the pharmaceutical industry. So getting people involved in this process is a wholesale waste of time.

Then I looked carefully at a message she sent to her supporters about Codex several months ago. In it I found the use of carefully-chosen psychologically-charged words, a technique used in psychological warfare tracts developed at U.S. Army Intelligence by a man named Edward G. Lansdale. This technique, called the Semantic Differential, has been used by our intelligence services widely, as part of programs to subvert “enemy” countries and other targets. (I first read about the Semantic Differential in a tract in Covert Intelligence Information Bulletin about psychological warfare used against Grenada, Chile, and Nicaragua.)

The Semantic Differential is a technique which uses culturally important psychologically-charged words to promote a particular point of view or, in the case of psychological warfare, to discredit an enemy. Here Dr. Laibow’s audience is middle-class, health-conscious, intelligent (and somewhat intellectual) Americans.

Here’s the example from Dr. Laibow’s message:

“If you think that your understanding of Codex is being manipulated by words (such as “risk assessment” as a scientific approach of toxicology appropriate to nutrients which are, by definition, non-toxic, for example), distortion (”CAFTA and FTAA have CODEX language in them so they are the same as the CODEX problem”) and distraction (who is a Druid?, who is a witch?, who is “Controlled Opposition”?, who is a CIA Agent?, who is a good person?, who is a bad person?, etc.”) you are right.”

The psychologically-charged words here are “manipulation,” “distortion,” and “distraction.” John Hammell had made the clear connection between CAFTA and Codex, and had accused the Natural Solutions Foundation (Dr. Laibow’s group) and several other organizations of being “controlled opposition groups” – groups taken over by, or owned by, people who appear to be opposed to Codex but who promote useless activism or tell people that there is nothing to worry about. In the above message, Dr. Laibow psychologically marginalizes Hammell’s position, not by refuting it, but by merely using words that do so by their psychological power in our culture among her audience.

Here is another even more dramatic example, from the next paragraph in her message:

“So the infighting and turf wars which have provided this distortion and distraction (and which the Natural Solutions Foundation will not dignify by entering since there is plenty of turf to go around in the world of health freedom) fulfill the role of the bloated and meaningless “news” that keeps us disconnected both from reality and from its meaning.”

Note the lead-in, using the psychologically-charged words “infighting” and “turf wars” before repeating the words “distortion” and “distraction.” She goes on to say that *her* (that is, her follower’s) organization stands above all this (“will not dignify by entering”). Then she goes in for the psychological kill: “bloated and meaningless news” that keeps us “disconnected both from reality and its meaning.” At this point, most readers would be subconsciously and consciously convinced that John Hammell is involving us in “turf wars,” “keeping us disconnected” from reality by distorting the facts and distracting everyone with “bloated and meaningless” news.

Finally, here is the psychological lead-out that puts people into their “comfort zone” knowing that what she has stated above is right and just:

“Read, study, follow the links and make sure that you are comfortable with both what is presented and what is concluded from that. Above all, question your sources and evaluate the answers carefully. I know that I do.

“You won’t always be correct, but you can always be informed. If you are an American, Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers gave you that opportunity and obligation.”

If people were feeling at all uncomfortable with her subtle attack on Hammell, this puts their minds at ease. Acting as if she had presented unbiased information, she uses the psychologically-charged words and phrases “comfortable,” “question your sources,” and “evaluate the answers carefully.” Then confirming that her audience is intelligent, she reminds them that they “won’t always be correct” but can “always be informed.” Last but not least, she invokes Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers giving us the “opportunity and obligation” to be informed.

In a similar article using similar psychological techniques, Dr. Laibow convinces readers, using psychologically-charged words such as “forces,” “intentional disinformation,” “misleading,” and “irrelevant” to convince her readers that attempting to stop the multinational treaty process is a waste of time, that instead they need to focus on changing the Codex regulations. Here’s are some excerpts:

“FTAA and CAFTA are really bad ideas for US interests. But all the recent focus in them as related to the CODEX issue because they contain CODEX language is either an error in the understanding of the real nature of the CODEX problem or, worse yet, intentional disinformation to drain off energy and political force from opposition to CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. FTAA and CAFTA are totally irrelevant to the CODEX issue.”

“Some people in the CODEX arena are now focusing on FTAA and CAFTA and saying that it is a waste of time to focus in CODEX because FTAA and CAFTA contain CODEX language in their text. These forces are either using mis- or dis- information by misleading people to think that because these trade agreements contain CODEX language they somehow are a significant part of the Codex problem.”

Dr. Laibow does not reveal that the many Codex committees are all controlled by the multinational agricultural and pharmaceutical companies, so that it is precisely what she is telling people to do – trying to change the Codex regulations – is fruitless. She does not reveal that the Codex regulations themselves, without multinational agreements such as FTAA and CAFTA in place, are just pieces of paper that lack any power.

These are masterful uses of Semantic Differential. Many orators and politicians have mastered this kind of psychological use of words without learning it from Army Intelligence, but one can only wonder where a naturopathic doctor such as Dr. Laibow might have learned to write in this fashion. Perhaps it was from working with her husband, General Albert Stubblebine, former head of the US Army Intelligence & Security Command (INSCOM) 1981-84. Anyone in that position would be steeped in knowledge about psychological warfare techniques and especially about the use of Semantic Differential.

While Dr. Laibow’s activism against the extreme excesses of the pharmaceutical industry appear to be genuine, one can only wonder why she is so intent on marginalizing those who want people to make the connection between Codex and the efforts by these same multinational corporations to enforce the Codex regulations and to place jurisdiction for that enforcement outside of Congress through multinational agreements such as WTO, CAFTA, and FTAA.

Jonathan Campbell
November 4, 2005


Dr. Laibow’s messages and Dr. Laibow’s messages

Reference on Albert Stubblebine:

Here is the lying Dr Laibow's response:

The TRUTH is our Defense…

Confused About the Natural Solutions Foundation?
That's Exactly What the Other Side Wants!

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

How to Stop Autistic Self Biting II

I wrote something last year about my problems with my son biting himself that drew lots of interest. I notice that many people still read this entry and, I hope, the useful suggestions that people submitted.

It seems I have solved the problem, finally. My son has only had a couple of minor, short-lived instances of biting himself in the past month.

I don't offer my solution as a complete answer for anyone else who has to deal with this nightmare but what helped my son may help others.

We have done 75 rounds of chelation to remove mercury and aluminum which resulted in much improved behavior and mental awareness. Chelation alone did not decrease the biting though. It was not until we began addressing the possibility that the liver needed some help that the biting diminished and is now virtually gone.

For my son, all we added to his supplememnt regimen was more milk thistle, more fish oil, vitamin D, increased vitamin E and acidophilus to control yeast. I found the suggestion to add these supplements amongst a treatment protocol designed to improve liver function for those with cirrhosis. There was much more to it as designed for cirrhosis so I added one supplement at a time until the behavior seemed to diminish. It worked. So, I offer this as a possible problem to address that should be checked with an MD to determine which supplements may be most likely to improve liver function to a point that will relieve the child of some pain and resolve the biting problem.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Tom Daschle Asks for Help

Tom Daschle asked me to host a community meeting to help the Obama administration learn how to fix healthcare. So, I decided to ask the autism community to let Mr Daschle hear our concerns on a blog. That way, we have a public record of it and don't have to take notes with shorthand.

While any issue regarding healthcare is open here, Mr Daschle specifically mentioned looking at prevention, and managing chronic care. Many of us share the same opinions about how to prevent autism and other vaccine induced neurological horrors and some may also be able to help the Obama administration come up with effective policies on managing long-term care. I'll leave it at that and hope some people will comment for Mr Daschle. For purposes of understanding who is commenting, there will be no anonymous comments allowed, pick some sort of name please.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Please Vote for Autism Reform Act

Here's the link to the page below on It would be nice if enough people voted for this to knock an inane idea like mandating that Esperanto be taught in schools out of the top spot. You have to register, then respond to an email that they send you to vote.

Accept and Sign " The Autism Reform Act of 2009"
As a country we have watched Autism Spectrum Disorders grow in a devastating number. Over the last decade it has spiraled so quickly out of control that: 1.) There must not just be one person but an ENTIRE U.S. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE for Educating Children with Autism. 2.) The use of Time Out Rooms, Corporal punishments, Restraints, and the high amount of Abuse must be monitored with severe penalties to states and fines or conviction of those that break such a REFORM Law. 3.) School Districts/States must each have an " Office of Autism Education Compliance or be subject to loss of Federal Funding. 4.) Due Process Hearing Officers must NOT be employees of the state and shall be employed by the Federal Government ONLY. 5.) Insurance companies MUST provide the Early Interventions such as ABA Discreet Trial at no cost to parents. 6.) Protection and Advocacy MUST be funded properly to allow parents that need help get it without any more then a 15 day waiting period.7.) Grants for research, education, and non profit organizations for those with Autism Spectrum Disorders must be made in the amount of 5 billion dollars.8.) Relief for parents who have paid out of pocket to educate their children must be made swiftly with 100% reimbursement. 9.) Behavior Intervention Plans must accompany all Individual Education Plans.10.) Insurance companies must make available all resources for children and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders including but not limited to any items deemed necessary by the physician for the treatment of metal toxicities and any other theraputic orders their physician may order. 11.) The Autism Reform Act shall consider all Autism Spectrum Disorders including Aspergers. 12.) This Reform Act must be 'open' for additions as needed and create a 12 parent panel to propose such additions.

- Michael Robinson (Founder The Office of Advocacy) Dec 09 @ 01:40AM PST

Thursday, December 04, 2008

Talk to President Obama,

Here's a chance to tell Obama about the horror of autism. Someone here is moderating comments so, at least we know they are reading them. This is an opportunity to flood this site with comments about how we are curing our autistic children and to ask Obama to stop the poisoning of our babies.

Monday, December 01, 2008

Autism Ripoff, Dr Kurt Woeller

Here's the link to Dr Woeller's site. As you can see below, for almost $500, you can look at Woeller's site.

Group Status: Open to All
Membership Criteria: None
Full Access Membership: $37.00 per month or $397.00 per year paid in advance
New Full Member Fee (one time): $97.00

Woeller seems to have it all figured out on his website for us so that he can have the site take care of the patients for him while he pockets $500. You can download prescription forms and all you have to do is bring it to a real live doctor for a signature. Of course, you have to pay the live doc for an office visit, maybe $80 for the minute it takes him to sign the form plus the cost of the prescription or lab work. Meanwhile, Woeller has your $500 for letting his site direct you to a live doctor. I wonder if I could find a live doctor by looking in the Yellow pages for less money?

I usually go here without paying $500 for the same information, maybe better. It would cost me $134 just to look at anything Woeller has to say to find out what kind of protocol he advises for chelation. So, I can't say if his advice is any good or not. It doesn't look like you can pay for Woeller's advice by having an insurance company pay for your membership to his site so it's probably much cheaper to see an actual live doctor who insurance might pay for. The last time I saw a DAN doctor, I think it cost me $300 but he could sign prescriptions in person and tell me what I needed to know without having to go see someone else at greater expense later.

Kurt Woeller, you're a real fucking humanitarian, aren't you? Wow, only $500 to learn what we can find for free all over the internet...dirtbag.

Someone came here to defend Dr Woeller. Some simple arithmetic shows that if he enlisted as many members as the Autism Mercury group (almost 8,000), Dr Woeller could grab himself about $800,000 just for allowing people to join his site. That does not include the monthly fees. That does not sound like a humanitarian motive to me.