Monday, July 10, 2006

Is Neurodiversity Simply Propaganda?

If I were Eli Lilly or the CDC, I'd consider Neurodiversity as a wonderful propaganda tool to help sway public opinion. Invent a bunch of alleged autistics who claim they don't want to be cured. Have them post from all over the Globe and have them present themselves as a unified force with things like the Autism Hub.
Note that it isn't Asperger's Hub or Neurodiverse Hub which would make more sense since most of the alleged autistics claim to celebrate having Asperger's, not Autism. By comingling a slew of blogs under the heading of Autism, the deranged notions presented on these blogs appear to the casual observer to be the voices of the autism community.
In reality, the Autism Hub is as far from the sentiments of families afflicted with autism as you can get. No parent wants their child to have autism. No parent intentionally injects poison into their babies. Yet, here we have all these neurodiverse blogs trying to pawn themselves off as representative of those whose lives have been destroyed by the nightmare called autism.
The Autism Society of America recently backed down on their support of an important provision in the proposed Combatting Autism Act. They claim to represent the interests of evryone on the spectrum. There are neurodiverse types associated with ASA who will stop at nothing to prevent the truth about thimerosal from being learned.
This has become a problem since the neurodiverse have managed to keep themselves included as part of the autism community. They are here to disrupt. They don't need anyone's approval to let their kids rot in the abyss of autism without trying to cure them. Why is it not in everyone's best interests to have research done to prove the fact that mercury caused the epidemic? ASA should recognize how important this is. Could neurodiverse propaganda have helped sway their decision to renege on their agreement?
Can anyone give me a good explanation why autism should not be cured? Neurodiversity claims it would be killing the autistic person to cure them. I claim it would be killing the drug companies if we could cure all of our kids. We just saw how difficult it is in court to get the truth out about thimerosal. I don't think the drug companies will have any defense if thousands of cured children start walking into courtrooms to testify about how they were cured. Is this the true reason neurodiversity is so adamantly opposed to curing autism? Is the concept of celebrating neurodiversity just a shoddy stab at propaganda that some unwitting parents might give creedence to?
The idea that we need to include all people with autism and be considerate of differing opinions goes out the window when these neurodiverse propagandists are directing their concerted efforts towards making negligent criminals look innocent. Sane and decent parents do not try to prevent other parents from helping their children overcome debilitating conditions such as autism. Sane and decent parents do not latch onto the accidental deaths of children from doctors errors during chelation to use as a condemnation of all well practiced chelation that helps children.
Every autism organization needs to purge itself of these neurodiverse types. They are nothing but a cancer with the sole intention of disrupting decent people from helping children. May they all rot in hell.

24 comments:

John Best said...

Joe;
There are no similarities between "train wrecks" who can't function and you.
It's time you stopped trying to disrupt parents from helping their children.

John Best said...

Joe;
People who are uninitiated to the wackiness of neurodiversity might actually listen to you when you tell them that curing autism is killing the autistic person.
It's the autism Hub that has no merit. I saw the new screen saying "We don't want no stinkin' cure". Is it the non-verbal kids who came up with that idea or their wacked out, idiotic parents?

John Best said...

Kev;
Your welcome. I'm always happy to expose you for the child abusers that you are.

John Best said...

AD;
Your Mr Leech already publicized my phone #. Someone sent me your witch's home address. I may still have it. Should I publicize that?

Anonymous said...

I got the phone number from you. Mr. Leech is a Jackass and I don't care much for him either.

Anonymous said...

Yes, please publicize it. I'll see if I can find more.

John Best said...

AD;
Publicizing someone's home address would make no sense unless there was a good reason for it. If someone wanted to protest outside Julie Gerberding's home and I had her address, I think that would be a good reason. I'm not in the habit of stooping to the Neurodiverse's level of childish nonsense.
Do you have any comment about the propaganda spread by the neurodiverse or did you just come here to show what an asshole you are by publicizing personal information?

Anonymous said...

In another comments section your gave away you phone number anyway.

btw unlike you we don't call and E-mail women to harase them (talked over in other blogs + mentioned on this site)

Anonymous said...

This conspiracy theroy makes no snese the only sort of 'evidence' is hearsay and conjecture.

John Best said...

Nat;
I don't know if you harass anyone or not. You do sneak around harvesting quotes that are taken out of context and without permission all the time.
Frist and his late night additions to legislation are not hearsay. Verstrtaeten continually rewriting his report until it showed favorably for the drug industry is not hearsay. The disappearance of the data he used is not hearsay. The fact that thimerosal is still used in vaccines is not hearsay. Etc..

Anonymous said...

"You do sneak around harvesting quotes that are taken out of context and without permission all the time"

I did no sch thing, anything spoen written etc. in a public forum (i.e. the internet) is open to be quoted, permission is implisset

When did I take your quotes out of context?

"Frist and his late night additions to legislation are not hearsay."

No, drawing concluions from that is.

Just so you know conjecture means argueing against a point as a form of 'evidience'

"The disappearance of the data he used is not hearsay."

No it is not, yet again using it as 'evidence' is.

John Best said...

Nat;
That's you (plural) for quote harvesting.
All that stuff is evidence. It's all attempts to deceive. I hope you never get jury duty if you can't see that.

Anonymous said...

Just apptempting to decive is NOT evidenice.

The deception is real, what the intent behind it is, is opinion ergo deception itself is not evidenice.

John Best said...

Nat;
Have you not heard of Simpsonwood where they admitted mercury was causing autism and planned to continue poisoning babies anyhow?
You have aligned yourself with evil people who do not want the truth about mercury to be learned. Accepting that truth might help you.
Courts are not about arriving at the truth. They are about who has the best lawyers to help criminals avoid paying for their crimes. You sound like a naive young man who has a lot to learn.

Anonymous said...

Do you think that maybe- just maybe- if the court aren't telling you the 'truth' you want to hear, then perhapes your truth isn't THE truth.

AutismNewsBeat said...

Fore Skin: What matters is not whether there is "evidence" for something, but rather, what is the quality of that evidence. After all, there is evidence that Santa Claus exists.

I learned that in college! Maybe you can go to college some day!

John Best said...

Heraldblog;
After I finished graduate school, I learned that if I was cashing tickets on 40 to 1 shots, I had interpreted the evidence that the horse could win correctly.
Cured kids are proof that the evidence of mercury poisoning was correct. The parents who learned to interpret that evidence correctly have cashed it in with kids who will not grow up to be neurodiverse nitwits.

Anonymous said...

Wow what a retort, Heraldblog will be reeling from that!

Anonymous said...

Nathzn,

Please give of the definitions of the following words:

harase
theroy
sch
spoen
implisset
concluions
argueing
evidience
apptempting
decive
evidenice
perhapes

Thanks in advance!

Anonymous said...

harase
theroy
sch
spoen
implisset
concluions
argueing
evidience
apptempting
decive
evidenice
perhapes


Well anon,

They'll just the same as regular words but with spelling errors, if you can't understand them then I'm surprised.

Recent research at cambridge discovered that as long as the first and last letters are correct, people's brain can read the word fine, tis is because we don't read every letter.

However obviously you seem to be slightly lacking the afforemention organ.

your Welcome in advance!

Anonymous said...

Nathzn,

Of course I could understand them, but you are pathetic in your spelling. It takes away from anything that you say... Of course your grammar sucks as well.

I need a peer-reviewed study on people who can't spell. It will be double blinded, of course. Let's see if people who can't spell (ever) are more likely to believe that injecting babies with a neurotoxin is good medical practice.

Anonymous said...

An Idiot: "After I finished graduate school, I learned that if I was cashing tickets on 40 to 1 shots, I had interpreted the evidence that the horse could win correctly."

It took a graduate education to figure that out?????

Shitting Jesus!

John Best said...

Anon;
Is that you Sanity Pending?
Some things aren't taught in schools, Dave. If you learn how to reason and separate the wheat from the chaff in your academic efforts, you can apply that ability in all sorts of real life situations. Cashing $20 bets on 40 to 1 horses beats the hell out of sitting behind a desk taking orders from someone.

Anonymous said...

Some cretinous arsehole: "Cashing $20 bets on 40 to 1 horses ..."

What? Three of whose a week? Better than McD's? Well... speaking as one who doesn't have to sit behind a desk taking orders (heh, heh... JBJr knows nothing!) I'd say that my career is already better than yours, John-boy.

One day, the rest of the world is going to look back on your antics here and say:

"What the fuck?!"

And then collectively piss itself laughing, to think that someone so stupid could even work out how to get three lucky wins a week!