1 : the betrayal of a trust : treachery 2 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
Treachery:
1 : violation of allegiance or of faith and confidence : treason 2 : an act of perfidy or treason
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
H.R. 1388: Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act
Amendment actions:
H.Amdt. 49 (Offered): Amendment (A012) offered by Mr. Miller, George. Amendment to prohibit organizations from attempting to influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing.
H.Amdt. 49 (Vote): On agreeing to the Miller, George amendment (A012) Agreed to by voice vote.
DO YOU SEE THE CONSTITUTIONAL TREASON?
This is the First Amendment that Congress has just abolished in the House of Representatives.
Our government has just announced to us that the Constitution of the United States of America has been revoked.
The Military and the Police must now recognize their duty. They are members of We the People as well our servants. For the Military to allow this Constitutional Treason by Congress is a violation of their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC!!!.
There can be no argument here. By abolishing the First Amendment, Congress has declared themselves to be enemies of the Constitution and enemies of We the People. Our Military and our Police owe their allegiances to We the People and to the Constitution. It is the obligated duty of the Military and the Police to take action against Congress by whatever means necessary as representatives and employees of We the People. Generals, Admirals and Police Chiefs are obligated to us to order Congress to revoke all actions regarding HR 1388 and its amendments, as well as the revocation of every other bill passed by Congress that violates the Constitution. Should Congress refuse to obey that lawful order, the Military may and should take whatever actions are deemed essential to stop this crime of Constitutional treason, and their duty is to do so forthwith.
If you agree that the 1st Amendment is something you'd like to have back, please write to the Joint Chiefs of Staff here and ask them to handle the treason of our Congress.
11 comments:
Is this true? Wher did you get this news? Do we hear this news from mainstream media?
Anon A
You can read the bill on the gov website. Do you wonder why it's not on the news?
Which website? Can you be more specific?
Anon A
Yes, under the words of the 1st amendment, you will find some underlined words. If you put your mouse on them and the little hand pops up where the mouse arrow used to be, you just click your mouse and you'll be taken to the site.
Please bear with me. So I go to www.govtrack.us. Where do I go from there?
Anon A
Uh... you do realize you're crying "treason" over a passage that says that the government can't pay lobbyists to lobby, don't you?
Because amendment you quote was an amendment to a bill that established organizations for national service. The reference to "prohibited organizations" in the amendment is referring to these alone.
Go here to see the final text of the bill as it was passed. Do a search for "132A", which is the section of the bill that was inserted by that amendment.
You'll notice it specifies clearly in the heading of the section that "An approved national service position under this subtitle may not be used for the following activities:"And then lists those things. The rights of the people have not been abridged. All Congress did was close a loophole where somebody could have set up a sweetheart deal for their pet cause where paid lobbyists (or agitators, or whatever) got taxpayer money funneled to them for furthering their private causes.
Tell me that's a bad thing.
You approved the last comment I made so obviously you've read it. Are you going to edit your post to put a retraction/clarification of the facts there?
Right now, this post of yours is advocating treason. You're asking the military (joint chiefs of staff) to take over our government on your behalf. This law... the national service law... was a cornerstone of Barack Obama's candidacy. It's a fulfillment of his promise to the people, and we the people chose to elect him knowing that. Our servants in Congress passed this law and they wisely included a proviso to make sure it doesn't get used to funnel our money to unions and lobbyists and special interest groups that are beyond the scope of its intention.
I don't want a military coup deposing our lawful, Constitutional government because they fulfilled a campaign promise. Do you?
You missed the point. This bill can indoctrinate my 11 year old son into involuntary education, during which he will be restrained from telling the President to go fuck himself. I intend to see that my son always has the right to tell any President to go fuck himself outside of being drafted at legal age to serve in the military.
Our Congress has violated my other son's rights egregiously. He was poisoned by government mandated vaccines and became autistic. Instead of stopping this poisoning of children, our President Obama has allowed it to continue. Congress passed laws to protact the criminals who do this to our children.
There are plenty of reasons our military needs to give Congress an order they can't refuse. They fail to uphold the Constitution daily.
Even if how you characterize the law in your comment were correct, your post is not. It is misinformation. Actually, now that you've had the truth pointed out to you, it's not even that... it's lies. What kind of a cause do you fight for that requires lies to get people to act?
Why would anyone believe your ability to understand information about vaccines and health and then present them with true statements about it when you make blatantly and verifiably false claims about other things, like what this law says and does?
It was true when I wrote it. You told us it changed. If someone wants to reread the bill, thanks for the info..
Alexandra Erin,
Evidently, I made the mistake of assuming you could read and reason. Do you realize that everyone who is subject to being ordered to serve the government or be educated by the government becomes a member of these organizations who are prohibited from enjoying the full rights of the first amendment, even when they are not actually engaged in the government task? Can you reason from there to see how all of us can have the first amendment revoked? If not, your just too stupid to bother with but, I'll do my part and try to protect your rights for you.
Post a Comment