Here is the book that parents should have embraced and the author who should be speaking for us instead of David Kirby. I think David Kirby hijacked the truth about autism so he could lead us all down the wrong path.
Here is part of the author's note from Evidence of Harm:
"In no way do I endorse the biomedical treatment for autism described in this book, nor could I. ...There is not enough evidence....Only through double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials will we know if these treatments provide any real benefit."
This sounds like something that could have been written by Dr David Gorski (Orac) or Kevin Leitch (dirtbag). This was written after some children had already been cured. Who better than a gay guy to con a bunch of parents who are predominantly women. Women trust gay guys easier than they trust straight guys since the sexual tension doesn't come into play. Whoever told Kirby to write this book knew something about psychological warfare.
Courtney Zietzke's phone number is not the same now. His email also does not reach him. I'd love to know how Mr Zietzke feels about Kirby's leadership. I think Zietzke's book was published about a year before Kirby's. Draw your own conclusions.
Mercury : The Winged Messenger by Courtney L. Zietzke
Format ISBN Price
Electronic Book 1414026447 $4.95
Paperback (5x8) 1418437816 $11.50
About the Book
This book will begin to answer questions about what many will eventually call the worst medical tragedy in modern medical history. The corrupt political system that has tried to protect and cover up the facts about this atrocity has only begun to show its evil face. This book tries to answer questions about why "Autism" has exploded into a national epidemic.
This national tragedy could have and should have been avoided.
These afflicted children need help.
The establishment(s) that caused this tragedy have been unsympethic, evasive and full of legal denials.
This book deals with the truth and will anger many people as a result.
Mercury is one of natures most toxic poisons.
Why was this poison intentionally injected into our children--.?
About the Author
Mr Courtney Zietzke is a 42 year old financial accountant from Seattle, WA. Over the last three years Mr. Zietzke has done extensive research into the causes of what many call "Autism." His opinions in this book are substantiated with proven facts and direct uncontested evidence. Mr. Zietzke like thousands of concerned parents wanted answers into what went wrong and most importantly why did this national tragedy have to happen.
Free Preview
INTRODUCTION
As a parent of an Autistic child, it is difficult to describe the pain and resentment that is felt by having a perfect baby and then having that baby snatched from you at about 16 months old.The brain damage that my child received should not have happened. The U.S.healthcare industry is the best in the World. There are safeguards and redundancies built into the system. However, in this case, the system failed and failed badly.
My child and countless others were injected with a substance known as Thimerosal. Thimerosal is an additive to baby vaccines that contains 49.6% Mercury. This substance was banned by the pet vaccination industry over ten years ago because of known health risks. The pharmaceutical industry kept this additive in the baby vaccines, knowing full well the risks to our children's health.
According to my child's weight and the amount of vaccines he received that contained this additive, my child and thousands of other children have received over 40 times the legal safety limit for mercury exposure as established by the Environmental Protection Agency.
I speak for literarily thousands of concerned and angry parents who basically got burned by a system that has been perverted by Greed, Politics, and Corruption.
In the last several years, the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ), the Centers of Disease Control ( CDC ) and the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) have granted hundreds of waivers of the conflict of interest rule in favor of the drug giants and their "paid consultants". Has the U.S. health care system been unduly influenced? Thousands of children have suffered the consequences of these people's greed and short sightedness.
My child was born perfectly healthy, full of life. He had the potential to achieve anything in life that he would have chosen to do. Because of a short sighted medical system that failed, my child is now a semi vegetative little boy who is lost in his own tortured world of mercury induced autism.
This book talks about the cause and the arrogant atmosphere that abounds in the vaccine community that has caused this tragedy. If you look at an autistic child, you will notice fear and profound sadness on their little faces. They are imprisoned in a world where they desperately want to escape, but can't. The frustration that these children feel and their cries for help have been ignored by the very system that caused this atrocity.
When I look upon other healthy six year old children who are playing, communicating and living normal lives, I wonder what might have been with my little boy. I am sure I am not alone in my thoughts. This is a painful and very tragic occurrence.
Instead of concern, sympathy and needed help, the Pharmaceutical industry and the "system" that caused this tragedy has been for the most part un sympathetic, evasive and full of legal denials. This book will anger many people, which is precisely what it is intended to do.
My desire is to light a fire under the bureaucrats, politicians and the medical community to get off their asses and do something to help these children. These children did not deserve what they got. The parents of these brain damaged children have suffered terrible pain and financial hardship as a result of the greed and political corruption from the very segment of our society that was supposed to invoke trust and medical excellence.
Is this book critical? You bet it is. I know I speak for thousands of people who, like myself want answers. The tragic truth is that every time a question is asked, all that is given in return is deception, distorted truths and out right lies from the very people we trusted the most.
Lastly, it is my hope that this book will at least get people asking the questions of
HOW? , WHO? And most importantly, WHY DID THIS HAPPEN TO THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT CHILDREN?
Friday, January 09, 2009
Who's Lying to J B Handley?
I read an interesting piece today at Age of Autism in which J B Handley presented his distaste for liars. I'm not allowed to comment there so I'll add some information about more deceptive liars here.
Some liars are so bold, they think they can lie about science to scientists. As we see in Dr King's message that David Kirby did not reply to, Kirby's 5th amendment right to stay silent is not conclusive proof that he is a liar. Of course, treacherous liars do not usually jump up and say, "Yup, I'm a (expletive deleted) liar". To continue to spout nonsense after he has been told the truth though, can only be interpreted as a lie by reasonable people.
Here's an email exchange I had with Kirby after he had been on the Oprah show in April of 2007 (in reverse order):
David, I'm going to guess your response would be politically correct. If you had watched a kid go from being a complete zombie to becoming human like I have with chelation, you would forget about ever using the word "maybe" when it comes to mercury in vaccines. The drug companies and doctors are emphatic in their denials. I think you can take a stronger stand. Otherwise, good job.
John Best
>From: David Kirby
>Date: 2007/04/06 Fri AM 11:24:20 CDT
>To: bettwice33@verizon.net
>Subject: Re: Oprah: Now its David Kirby's turn
>
>Nice Comment
>
>You can imagine what my response is
>
>Dk
Kirby's private email to me was in response to this message I had written on EOHarm:
Re: Oprah: Now its David Kirby's turn
David Kirby will only say that there might be a connection. I'd much
rather see JB Handley on the show. Comments to Oprah should include
lots of references to Generation Rescue so people learn how to help
their kids.
Here was Kirby's public reply on EOHarm:
Re: Oprah: Now its David Kirby's turn
Thanks Erik
I guess John would like to see me laughed off the stage
dk
Do you see how Kirby was laughing at you and GR there, Mr Handley? He tried to tell us that mentioning curing autism would get him laughed off the stage. As with Dr King's constructive criticism, Kirby refused to reply to my personal email back to him, an email that detailed how one of the worst cases of autism anyone has ever seen (my son) was recovering.
Can you see how MR Kirby had sucked in all of those parents on EOHarm who saw this (expletive deleted) (derogatory term deleted) as some sort of savior? Nobody on EOHarm wanted to risk pissing this (derogatory term deleted) off while he sodomized your kid and mine by refusing to state the truth, that we were curing this God damned nighttmare.
Here's something else one would think a "reporter" like Mr Kirby would be interested in. This piece that I wrote in October showed how Harvard and Mass. General had done a sham study on Alzheimer's that could be easily correlated to autism. In fact, this study could work towards aborting normal babies by falsely "tagging" them with a genetic marker for autism because Harvard had lied in the study about how the genetic marker (the APO proteins) works. This bit of scientific scamming should have Kirby up in arms but, as with other truths he has been given, Kirby is silent.
Here's something else I wrote that should have provoked some discussion about another Pharmaceutical scam. Nope, silence everywhere.
Then, there was this piece where Kirby and Olmsted supported Kathleen Seidel's right to try to prevent us all from curing autism. I had sent the following letter to Olmsted and, you guesseed it, no reply.
Hi Dan,
I don't know if you are aware that I seem to be the only blogger defending Cliff
Shoemaker. First, I'd like to know if you and Mr Kirby did send a response to Orac, as
he stated on his Respectful Insolence blog?
I want you to understand my perspective here. Kathleen Seidel has gone way beyond the
bounds of legitimate journalism in her bashing of Mark Geier. She accused Dr Geier of
engaging in criminal acts to defraud insurance companies so that people could pay for
Lupron treatments. The way I see it is that Dr Geier found a way to circumvent bogus
insurance rules so that autistic children could benefit from his treatments. Is Seidel
entitled to her opinion here, perhaps.
What Seidel is not entitled to do however, is to present her bogus opinions about Dr
Geier chemically castrating children while never once admitting the FACT that these
children have benefitted from the Lupron treatments. I can't afford these treatments and I can't travel to Maryland with my autistic son to have him see Dr Geier.
By not mentioning the fact that Dr Geier is helping these children, Seidel is
intentionally lying about Dr Geier, damaging his reputation and making it less likely that my son will ever be able to see any doctor who could allow him to benefit from said treatments. Since he is almost 12 years old, the window of opportunity for him to receive these treatments is almost gone.
What about the other children who could benefit from using Lupron? Does Seidel's
untrue attack on Dr Geier contribute to preventing these other children from receiving Lupron? If one parent believes what Seidel says and misses an opportunity that could have helped their child, that means that Seidel has harmed that child by her untrue attacks on Dr Geier. That equates to child abuse.
Seidel is a decent writer and some people will believe her pure bullshit. I don't
think she has the right to lie about treatments that can benefit autistic children. Do you really support Seidel lying about treatments that help us cure our kids? Do you really think that writing lies that affect the well-being of children are protected under the first amendment?
Have you talked to any parents who have used Lupron and been treated by Dr Geier? I have. By every report I have gained, Seidel is nothing but a (expletive deleted) liar. You supporting her means you agree that it is OK for this (expletive deleted) to prevent my son from being cured of autism.
Thank you,
John Best
Londonderry, NH
Before I wrote that post criticizing Kirby and Olmsted, I tried one last time to talk some sense into the people you blog with at AOA. Here is that last exchange in an email with Kim Stagliano:
bettwice33@juno.com"
To : KRStagliano@charter.net
Subject : Re: Comment to Dan
Date : Wed, Apr 30, 2008 09:12 AM
Hi Kim,
I don't care that you deleted my comment. I just wanted Dan to see it.
I wrote to Dan twice about his support for Seidel and he hasn't had the courtesy to bother answering me.
I've been studying the propaganda from Neurodiversity since it began and I have
refuted a heck of a lot of their nonsense. Dan supporting her right to blog is tacit support of allowing her to lie to parents and give them bad information that COULD prevent them from helping their kids. She is a very good liar and this is a real concern since lots of parents do not have college degrees and the ability to see through all of her lies.
I've been in this fight a lot longer than Dan. Evidently, he thinks he knows more about it than I do. He doesn't.
I'm not questioning his heart, his intelligence or his knowledge. I am questioning his appreciation for the expertise that Seidel has in spreading her propaganda. Make no mistake, her propaganda is spreading, as evidenced by two articles about her this week in New Hampshire papers. One of them was on the front page.
The Concord Monitor published a small part of my letter refuting what she had to say today. This morning, I had a call from a state rep. who wanted to know more. I'll be meeting with her soon.
This propaganda campaign is not just a few nitwit bloggers as Lenny Schafer would have you believe. It's massive, and Seidel, Orac and the rest of the scumbags are laughing that they goaded Dan and Kirby into defending this lying scoundrel who wants to hurt your kids and mine.
Does Dan understand how much damage Amanda Baggs does to our position with her national TV appearances? Does he fully understand that every word Seidel says is carefully designed propaganda? I've compared her to Joseph Goebbels. I don't think I've overstated my position. When she can manage to have herself published in the mainstream media, she has to be opposed. Doess Dan think it's acceptable for her to lie to the public in these newspapers too?
John
Good morning, John. Wanted to let you know that I deleted your comment to Dan on A of A –
we made a conscious effort to keep Seidel OFF Age of Autism during that time. Dan
decided that it’s best to leave her name off the blog altogether rather than get people
thinking about her. So I deleted the comment. I had approved it at first. You may
have seen that. I don’t want you to think we’re censoring your comments. We’d just
rather leave Ms. Seidel off the blog.
Also, Dan supported her rights to blog – that’s not the same as supporting her views.
Dan is pretty much unimpeachable in terms of where his heart is.
Thanks.
LOL, gotta love that line by Kim, huh? Supporting a liar's right to blog is not the same as supporting her views. Sure if you're so far out in left field that you don't know there is a propaganda war going on to prevent people from curing children whose brains have been severely mangled by vaccines, maybe that idiotic line of reasoning makes sense. I haven't been dumbed down to that level. And, as usual, no reply to my concerns was forthcoming.
All of these little lies of omission add up, Mr Handley. The fact that Kirby refuses to state that we KNOW beyond the slightest doubt that thimerosal scrambled our kids' brains just does not fit. The fact that Kirby acts like some screwball by suggesting that mercury blew across the Pacific to cause autism while ignoring the fact that fetuses were having their brains scrambled in the womb by flu shots does not add up to what one should expect from a guy who pretends to be a spokesman for all of us.
I don't begrudge you your vax versus non-vax study but that's already done too, isn't it? That Chicago practice? While Kirby keeps supporting studies, he has neglected something a lot more important. The time those studies waste is time that kids with thimerosal scrambled brains should ALL be using towards regaining their normalcy.
Whether it is intentional or Kirby is just a (derogatory term deleted) who's afraid of his shadow, his perpetual call for studies and his refusal to state what we know as facts is doing exactly what Pharma would love him to do...waste our TIME.
Disingenuous rhetoric that does not state the whole truth should have a familiar ring to it. It's also what Kelli Ann Davis allows when she sits at the IACC and allows a lying, (expletive deleted), (expletive deleted) like Ari Ne'eman to present himself as Autistic when the little (expletive deleted) has Asperger's. Did she ever ask Ari Ne'eman publicly if he smeared feces, or bit himself, or bit others, or could comb his hair, read, write, avoid running into traffic or get laid?
It should bother the hell out of everyone at AOA that this corrupt college student is presenting his anti-cure bullshit as though he suffered from the same type of mangled brains that our kids suffer from. He wants Obama to think that kids like my son don't want to be cured of the behavior of smearing feces all over himself. He pulls this off by suggesting that being anti-cure doesn't mean being anti-progress...as though my trying to stop this disgusting behavior for 10 (expletive deleted) years is going to somehow be magically fixed by this (expletive deleted) (expletive deleted) shoving Kathleen Seidel's rhetoric down Obama's throat.
To not oppose this (expletive deleted) is to support him. The lies of omission within AOA are a lot more dangerous than the obviously dishonest crap from Paul Offit. Of course, I could be wrong and these people who pretend to speak on my son's behalf are just the dumbest (expletive deleted) on the planet.
You need to ask yourself about those half-truths, you know, the propaganda style lies...the ones like MAYBE thimerosal has something to do with autism. MAYBE, people like Kirby, who choose to speak for my son should learn how tell the whole truth or shut the (expletive deleted) up. MAYBE, presenting the slightest possibility that Paul Offit is telling the truth is not in our childrens' best interest.
(Expletive deleted) David Kirby.
Some liars are so bold, they think they can lie about science to scientists. As we see in Dr King's message that David Kirby did not reply to, Kirby's 5th amendment right to stay silent is not conclusive proof that he is a liar. Of course, treacherous liars do not usually jump up and say, "Yup, I'm a (expletive deleted) liar". To continue to spout nonsense after he has been told the truth though, can only be interpreted as a lie by reasonable people.
Here's an email exchange I had with Kirby after he had been on the Oprah show in April of 2007 (in reverse order):
David, I'm going to guess your response would be politically correct. If you had watched a kid go from being a complete zombie to becoming human like I have with chelation, you would forget about ever using the word "maybe" when it comes to mercury in vaccines. The drug companies and doctors are emphatic in their denials. I think you can take a stronger stand. Otherwise, good job.
John Best
>From: David Kirby
>Date: 2007/04/06 Fri AM 11:24:20 CDT
>To: bettwice33@verizon.net
>Subject: Re: Oprah: Now its David Kirby's turn
>
>Nice Comment
>
>You can imagine what my response is
>
>Dk
Kirby's private email to me was in response to this message I had written on EOHarm:
Re: Oprah: Now its David Kirby's turn
David Kirby will only say that there might be a connection. I'd much
rather see JB Handley on the show. Comments to Oprah should include
lots of references to Generation Rescue so people learn how to help
their kids.
Here was Kirby's public reply on EOHarm:
Re: Oprah: Now its David Kirby's turn
Thanks Erik
I guess John would like to see me laughed off the stage
dk
Do you see how Kirby was laughing at you and GR there, Mr Handley? He tried to tell us that mentioning curing autism would get him laughed off the stage. As with Dr King's constructive criticism, Kirby refused to reply to my personal email back to him, an email that detailed how one of the worst cases of autism anyone has ever seen (my son) was recovering.
Can you see how MR Kirby had sucked in all of those parents on EOHarm who saw this (expletive deleted) (derogatory term deleted) as some sort of savior? Nobody on EOHarm wanted to risk pissing this (derogatory term deleted) off while he sodomized your kid and mine by refusing to state the truth, that we were curing this God damned nighttmare.
Here's something else one would think a "reporter" like Mr Kirby would be interested in. This piece that I wrote in October showed how Harvard and Mass. General had done a sham study on Alzheimer's that could be easily correlated to autism. In fact, this study could work towards aborting normal babies by falsely "tagging" them with a genetic marker for autism because Harvard had lied in the study about how the genetic marker (the APO proteins) works. This bit of scientific scamming should have Kirby up in arms but, as with other truths he has been given, Kirby is silent.
Here's something else I wrote that should have provoked some discussion about another Pharmaceutical scam. Nope, silence everywhere.
Then, there was this piece where Kirby and Olmsted supported Kathleen Seidel's right to try to prevent us all from curing autism. I had sent the following letter to Olmsted and, you guesseed it, no reply.
Hi Dan,
I don't know if you are aware that I seem to be the only blogger defending Cliff
Shoemaker. First, I'd like to know if you and Mr Kirby did send a response to Orac, as
he stated on his Respectful Insolence blog?
I want you to understand my perspective here. Kathleen Seidel has gone way beyond the
bounds of legitimate journalism in her bashing of Mark Geier. She accused Dr Geier of
engaging in criminal acts to defraud insurance companies so that people could pay for
Lupron treatments. The way I see it is that Dr Geier found a way to circumvent bogus
insurance rules so that autistic children could benefit from his treatments. Is Seidel
entitled to her opinion here, perhaps.
What Seidel is not entitled to do however, is to present her bogus opinions about Dr
Geier chemically castrating children while never once admitting the FACT that these
children have benefitted from the Lupron treatments. I can't afford these treatments and I can't travel to Maryland with my autistic son to have him see Dr Geier.
By not mentioning the fact that Dr Geier is helping these children, Seidel is
intentionally lying about Dr Geier, damaging his reputation and making it less likely that my son will ever be able to see any doctor who could allow him to benefit from said treatments. Since he is almost 12 years old, the window of opportunity for him to receive these treatments is almost gone.
What about the other children who could benefit from using Lupron? Does Seidel's
untrue attack on Dr Geier contribute to preventing these other children from receiving Lupron? If one parent believes what Seidel says and misses an opportunity that could have helped their child, that means that Seidel has harmed that child by her untrue attacks on Dr Geier. That equates to child abuse.
Seidel is a decent writer and some people will believe her pure bullshit. I don't
think she has the right to lie about treatments that can benefit autistic children. Do you really support Seidel lying about treatments that help us cure our kids? Do you really think that writing lies that affect the well-being of children are protected under the first amendment?
Have you talked to any parents who have used Lupron and been treated by Dr Geier? I have. By every report I have gained, Seidel is nothing but a (expletive deleted) liar. You supporting her means you agree that it is OK for this (expletive deleted) to prevent my son from being cured of autism.
Thank you,
John Best
Londonderry, NH
Before I wrote that post criticizing Kirby and Olmsted, I tried one last time to talk some sense into the people you blog with at AOA. Here is that last exchange in an email with Kim Stagliano:
bettwice33@juno.com"
To : KRStagliano@charter.net
Subject : Re: Comment to Dan
Date : Wed, Apr 30, 2008 09:12 AM
Hi Kim,
I don't care that you deleted my comment. I just wanted Dan to see it.
I wrote to Dan twice about his support for Seidel and he hasn't had the courtesy to bother answering me.
I've been studying the propaganda from Neurodiversity since it began and I have
refuted a heck of a lot of their nonsense. Dan supporting her right to blog is tacit support of allowing her to lie to parents and give them bad information that COULD prevent them from helping their kids. She is a very good liar and this is a real concern since lots of parents do not have college degrees and the ability to see through all of her lies.
I've been in this fight a lot longer than Dan. Evidently, he thinks he knows more about it than I do. He doesn't.
I'm not questioning his heart, his intelligence or his knowledge. I am questioning his appreciation for the expertise that Seidel has in spreading her propaganda. Make no mistake, her propaganda is spreading, as evidenced by two articles about her this week in New Hampshire papers. One of them was on the front page.
The Concord Monitor published a small part of my letter refuting what she had to say today. This morning, I had a call from a state rep. who wanted to know more. I'll be meeting with her soon.
This propaganda campaign is not just a few nitwit bloggers as Lenny Schafer would have you believe. It's massive, and Seidel, Orac and the rest of the scumbags are laughing that they goaded Dan and Kirby into defending this lying scoundrel who wants to hurt your kids and mine.
Does Dan understand how much damage Amanda Baggs does to our position with her national TV appearances? Does he fully understand that every word Seidel says is carefully designed propaganda? I've compared her to Joseph Goebbels. I don't think I've overstated my position. When she can manage to have herself published in the mainstream media, she has to be opposed. Doess Dan think it's acceptable for her to lie to the public in these newspapers too?
John
Good morning, John. Wanted to let you know that I deleted your comment to Dan on A of A –
we made a conscious effort to keep Seidel OFF Age of Autism during that time. Dan
decided that it’s best to leave her name off the blog altogether rather than get people
thinking about her. So I deleted the comment. I had approved it at first. You may
have seen that. I don’t want you to think we’re censoring your comments. We’d just
rather leave Ms. Seidel off the blog.
Also, Dan supported her rights to blog – that’s not the same as supporting her views.
Dan is pretty much unimpeachable in terms of where his heart is.
Thanks.
LOL, gotta love that line by Kim, huh? Supporting a liar's right to blog is not the same as supporting her views. Sure if you're so far out in left field that you don't know there is a propaganda war going on to prevent people from curing children whose brains have been severely mangled by vaccines, maybe that idiotic line of reasoning makes sense. I haven't been dumbed down to that level. And, as usual, no reply to my concerns was forthcoming.
All of these little lies of omission add up, Mr Handley. The fact that Kirby refuses to state that we KNOW beyond the slightest doubt that thimerosal scrambled our kids' brains just does not fit. The fact that Kirby acts like some screwball by suggesting that mercury blew across the Pacific to cause autism while ignoring the fact that fetuses were having their brains scrambled in the womb by flu shots does not add up to what one should expect from a guy who pretends to be a spokesman for all of us.
I don't begrudge you your vax versus non-vax study but that's already done too, isn't it? That Chicago practice? While Kirby keeps supporting studies, he has neglected something a lot more important. The time those studies waste is time that kids with thimerosal scrambled brains should ALL be using towards regaining their normalcy.
Whether it is intentional or Kirby is just a (derogatory term deleted) who's afraid of his shadow, his perpetual call for studies and his refusal to state what we know as facts is doing exactly what Pharma would love him to do...waste our TIME.
Disingenuous rhetoric that does not state the whole truth should have a familiar ring to it. It's also what Kelli Ann Davis allows when she sits at the IACC and allows a lying, (expletive deleted), (expletive deleted) like Ari Ne'eman to present himself as Autistic when the little (expletive deleted) has Asperger's. Did she ever ask Ari Ne'eman publicly if he smeared feces, or bit himself, or bit others, or could comb his hair, read, write, avoid running into traffic or get laid?
It should bother the hell out of everyone at AOA that this corrupt college student is presenting his anti-cure bullshit as though he suffered from the same type of mangled brains that our kids suffer from. He wants Obama to think that kids like my son don't want to be cured of the behavior of smearing feces all over himself. He pulls this off by suggesting that being anti-cure doesn't mean being anti-progress...as though my trying to stop this disgusting behavior for 10 (expletive deleted) years is going to somehow be magically fixed by this (expletive deleted) (expletive deleted) shoving Kathleen Seidel's rhetoric down Obama's throat.
To not oppose this (expletive deleted) is to support him. The lies of omission within AOA are a lot more dangerous than the obviously dishonest crap from Paul Offit. Of course, I could be wrong and these people who pretend to speak on my son's behalf are just the dumbest (expletive deleted) on the planet.
You need to ask yourself about those half-truths, you know, the propaganda style lies...the ones like MAYBE thimerosal has something to do with autism. MAYBE, people like Kirby, who choose to speak for my son should learn how tell the whole truth or shut the (expletive deleted) up. MAYBE, presenting the slightest possibility that Paul Offit is telling the truth is not in our childrens' best interest.
(Expletive deleted) David Kirby.
Thursday, January 08, 2009
Autism, Vaccination and Neurodiversity, A Timeline
Disclaimer: "Although I believe that vaccines caused the autism epidemic of the 90s, I do not believe that all autism is caused by vaccines. Autism is a syndrome, a group of symptoms, that can follow brain injury. Vaccines can cause encephalitis, and the symptoms of post-encephalitic syndrome are identical to autism. I do not believe that the thimerosal/mercury in vaccines is the only culprit. Reducing the amount of thimerosal in vaccines will not make vaccines safe. Removing thimerosal entirely will not make vaccines safe. Vaccines are full of chemicals that should not be pumped ad nauseam into human bodies without any prior research on what these chemicals do, or which organs they target and affect. "
Autism, Vaccination and Neurodiversity - A Timeline
by "Watson"
Part 2
Part 3
There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that the Neurodiversity movement is being supported by our governments and BigPharma. They know very well that many children were damaged by vaccines in the 1990s and, for once, there was an unacceptable number of casualties.
They have always regarded a few casualties as an acceptable trade-off - that's where "the benefit of vaccination outweighs the risks" comes from. The "benefit" they are referring to is not just the supposed benefit to an individual child, it is the supposed benefit to the entire population. The "risk" is to the child. So the slogan should read, "The benefit of vaccination to the population outweighs the risk to your baby." They are putting babies one at a time in the balance. And they really don't care about individual babies. Our babies.
So they had a real problem when worldwide tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of parents, like myself, witnessed their babies, toddlers and young children react to vaccines, sometimes severely as my son did, then lose their ability to communicate and go on to develop a cluster of symptoms, defined as autism, and diagnosed as "autism". There was no explanation given for our children's loss in development. They said it was called regressive-type autism that "just happens sometimes". There was no cause. Autism was not a known result of vaccination, therefore "autism" following vaccination, despite severe reactions, was not a known injury and would not be compensated.
Now the first and only priority has always been to protect the Immunisation Programme - at all costs. Even Jenner did it. When children and adults got smallpox despite being appropriately vaccinated, Jenner said that they would have had a much, much worse case of pox if they hadn't been vaccinated, or worse, they would have died. When children became severely ill after smallpox vaccination, or were brain-damaged, or died, 'something else' was always blamed. Vaccination couldn't be associated with failure to protect, injury or death.
Nothing has changed.
Except in the nineties, it was no longer the case of a child sacrificed here and there, and parents believing that their child was one of the unlucky 'one in a million' damaged by vaccines. With the Internet, parents of vaccine-injured children all over the world could now 'meet' and compare notes - and together, try to find out exactly what it was in the vaccines that had caused their children's problems so that they might recover their children.
Faced with many, many children damaged by vaccines, what were vaccine manufacturers and governments mandating those vaccines to do? Parents would lose confidence in vaccination, and that couldn't be allowed to happen.
Fearmongering was one strategy: "If fewer people immunise their children, there will be outbreaks of KILLER DISEASES. Children will DIE!"
And the other was to change attitudes towards autism.
Now, how were they going to do that?
Prior to 1999, few books had been written about the syndrome, all but two that I can think of were written from a parents' perspective, and they were read mostly by parents of children with autism, not the general public who knew next to nothing, if anything at all, about the disorder. Most had never even heard the word. Temple Grandin's 'Emergence: Labeled Autistic' was the first, published in 1986. Then in 1991 Donna Williams' book appeared.
I think it's important for people to realise that Donna did not write 'Nobody Nowhere' as an autistic person writing about autism. At the time of writing, she didn't have a diagnosis of autism. It was her autobiography, but its original title was "Dolly; autobiography of a disturbed child". Donna says that it was packaged by the publishers as 'Nobody Nowhere: Autobiography of an Autistic Girl', as if she had no idea at the time that "autistic girl" was going to be in its finished title.
Then after the thimerosal-autism link started to surface Jasmine O'Neill wrote her book, published in 1999 - 'Through the Eyes of Aliens: A Book about Autistic People'. She claimed to have very severe Kanner's autism and to be a savant in writing, music and art. She was an elective mute. This was the very first book to mention "celebration" and "beauty" in connection with autism, and the one that became Amanda Baggs' bible.
Not long afterwards, O'Neill flew off to settle in Hawaii with "the love of her life". She moved on.
In the same year 1999, an association was made between autism and genius. Speculative articles appeared such as, "Was Einstein Autistic?", followed by articles such as The Little Professor Syndrome, New York Times Magazine, June 18, 2000.
Frank Klein, then aged 29, apparently read the article which he said "explained everything" and led him a year later to Pittsburgh University and a diagnosis of High Functioning Autism.
He then set up his "Asperger's Advocacy" website which he later changed to "Autism Advocacy" when he said he realized he was more High Functioning than an Aspie. And, amongst other articles, such as, "Don't Cure Autism Now!" and "The Truth of The Myth of The Lack of Autism Recovery", he wrote "Autism, Genius and Greatness".
Then after four years of advocacy, he moved on.
In the meantime Judy Singer coined the word "Neurodiversity" and linked autism to "Nerds Wierdos, and OddBalls" in 1999.
Autistics.org was created by Laura Tisoncik, and Amanda Baggs joined her in 1999/2000.
Then Baron-Cohen's Aspie quizzes appeared, and screening for autism and Aspergers in younger and younger children began. The idea of an ASD which soon became "Autism" was extended to include any toddler with speech delay or shyness, and any shy or socially awkward teen with special interests.
Jim Laidler the ex-DAN! doctor who posted on autism support forums that his two sons had been damaged by vaccines and how they had made great progress after chelation - which is why Dr Rimland chose him to write the DAN! position paper on Mercury Detoxification of Autistic Children in 2001 - turned Judas a year later and joined Quackwatch, starting up his own branch of the organization named Autism-Watch. He had recanted and returned to the fold. Had he ever really left?
In 2002 Edan, diagnosed with Aspergers in 2001, created the website "Aspergia".
He writes:
"At school they are often viewed as normal children, if a little awkward or introverted but childhood and adolescence are such turbulent years anyway that many AMs (Aspergian Mutants) are missed completely". "AM children often develop some special powers too."
"When AM (Aspergian Mutant) individuals combine their strong personal focus with their special power, they have an extraordinary potential to contribute to society and develop new and striking inventions and works of art or science. Further research is required in the field of history to find out how many central innovative figures in human history did indeed have Aspergian traits."
In 2004 Edan moved on.
Bonnie Ventura, and many others, who found Edan's site about "Aspergians", and as a self-identified "Aspergian", jumped on board with her ideas, for one - a site for science fiction writers, which generated much more online Aspie traffic.
The idea that a cure for autism would lead to abortion of autistic fetuses and genocide of a whole race (a superior race - the next step in human evolution) was brilliant! It had anti-abortionists and minority groups up-in-arms, and had, and still has, many people who know a child with an ASD concerned, and self-diagnosed Aspies quaking in their boots.
In 2004, the "Aspies for Freedom" forum was created by Amy and Gareth Nelson, which has the wholehearted support of Simon Baron-Cohen and Tony Attwood, the UK and Australasian autism experts.
In the same year, Kathleen Seidel's undoubtedly pro-vaccination, Neurodiversity.com sprang into action with links to Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch and Laidler's Autism-Watch - which has links back to Neurodiversity.com, Autism Diva and other ND sites and blogs. Simon Baron-Cohen is in touch with Seidel, and he has praised her for her efforts. This year in the March edition of the British Medical Journal he said, "I'm very impressed by the scholarship in the neurodiversity.com website".
Now the word "autism" appears regularly in our newspapers, often linked with genius and giftedness. There must be literally hundreds of books about autism, many of them written by "autistics" or parents of "autistics" who are painting an entirely different picture of autism. I hear that Uta Frith and Simon Baron Cohen have enthusiastically supported "autistic" authors.
We have certainly come a long way since 1988 and the movie Rainman. Aspies today are surprised when they discover that the character, Raymond Babbit, was inspired by the life of the real autistic-savant Kim Peek, and that at the time Kim Peek was regarded as a high-functioning autistic.
Since 1999, several films have been made, and others are on the way, such as the Jason McElwain Movie, all depicting a different kind of autism that wasn't familiar even ten years ago.
Ten years ago, who would have guessed that the president of the USA would be photographed with an autistic basketball player? Who then could have imagined that a young man with autism would be able to play basketball - a fast-paced team sport, with the high-level activity and noise that the game entails?
Since 1999, the face of autism has been and is being deliberately changed.
Let's return to 1999. By that time, the rate of autism had climbed to 1 in 166, and many parents of children with regressive autism were waiting impatiently for the rate of autism to drop after the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. They knew it would take a few years, but they were sure that it would happen. To see a decline in the rate would have been positive proof that a substance repeatedly injected into children's bodies had damaged their brains. Unfortunately, for us and our children, that could never be allowed to happen.
The numbers kept rising, and are still rising. Last month Simon Baron-Cohen announced that autism now affects 1 in 58 children.
To the public that means that 1 in 58 children have autism. They don't. Simon Baron-Cohen knows that 1 in 58 children don't have autism. It is a deliberate deception to keep the rate of "Autism" skyrocketing in the public eye.
Joe and Jane Public read their newspaper, see the numbers rising, and completely dismiss the idea that vaccines cause autism. Their doctor has assured them that vaccines are safe, and warned them that without vaccination their baby could die or be severely brain-damaged from "a preventable disease". They've also read that Einstein, Michelangelo and Jane Austin had autism, and they've heard that autistic children are highly intelligent, gifted, and might even have special powers. They wonder what all the fuss is about. There's no question that they will vaccinate their baby.
O'Neill, Edan and Klein have moved on. How many of the current Neurodiversity activists will move on and get on with their lives, leaving their advocacy behind? Parents don't just advocate for their children with autism for a few years and move on. They can't. It's a life-time commitment.
What was and is the Neurodiversity movement's real aim? Looking at the timeline, what do you think?
Part 2
Part 3
Autism, Vaccination and Neurodiversity - A Timeline
by "Watson"
Part 2
Part 3
There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that the Neurodiversity movement is being supported by our governments and BigPharma. They know very well that many children were damaged by vaccines in the 1990s and, for once, there was an unacceptable number of casualties.
They have always regarded a few casualties as an acceptable trade-off - that's where "the benefit of vaccination outweighs the risks" comes from. The "benefit" they are referring to is not just the supposed benefit to an individual child, it is the supposed benefit to the entire population. The "risk" is to the child. So the slogan should read, "The benefit of vaccination to the population outweighs the risk to your baby." They are putting babies one at a time in the balance. And they really don't care about individual babies. Our babies.
So they had a real problem when worldwide tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of parents, like myself, witnessed their babies, toddlers and young children react to vaccines, sometimes severely as my son did, then lose their ability to communicate and go on to develop a cluster of symptoms, defined as autism, and diagnosed as "autism". There was no explanation given for our children's loss in development. They said it was called regressive-type autism that "just happens sometimes". There was no cause. Autism was not a known result of vaccination, therefore "autism" following vaccination, despite severe reactions, was not a known injury and would not be compensated.
Now the first and only priority has always been to protect the Immunisation Programme - at all costs. Even Jenner did it. When children and adults got smallpox despite being appropriately vaccinated, Jenner said that they would have had a much, much worse case of pox if they hadn't been vaccinated, or worse, they would have died. When children became severely ill after smallpox vaccination, or were brain-damaged, or died, 'something else' was always blamed. Vaccination couldn't be associated with failure to protect, injury or death.
Nothing has changed.
Except in the nineties, it was no longer the case of a child sacrificed here and there, and parents believing that their child was one of the unlucky 'one in a million' damaged by vaccines. With the Internet, parents of vaccine-injured children all over the world could now 'meet' and compare notes - and together, try to find out exactly what it was in the vaccines that had caused their children's problems so that they might recover their children.
Faced with many, many children damaged by vaccines, what were vaccine manufacturers and governments mandating those vaccines to do? Parents would lose confidence in vaccination, and that couldn't be allowed to happen.
Fearmongering was one strategy: "If fewer people immunise their children, there will be outbreaks of KILLER DISEASES. Children will DIE!"
And the other was to change attitudes towards autism.
Now, how were they going to do that?
Prior to 1999, few books had been written about the syndrome, all but two that I can think of were written from a parents' perspective, and they were read mostly by parents of children with autism, not the general public who knew next to nothing, if anything at all, about the disorder. Most had never even heard the word. Temple Grandin's 'Emergence: Labeled Autistic' was the first, published in 1986. Then in 1991 Donna Williams' book appeared.
I think it's important for people to realise that Donna did not write 'Nobody Nowhere' as an autistic person writing about autism. At the time of writing, she didn't have a diagnosis of autism. It was her autobiography, but its original title was "Dolly; autobiography of a disturbed child". Donna says that it was packaged by the publishers as 'Nobody Nowhere: Autobiography of an Autistic Girl', as if she had no idea at the time that "autistic girl" was going to be in its finished title.
Then after the thimerosal-autism link started to surface Jasmine O'Neill wrote her book, published in 1999 - 'Through the Eyes of Aliens: A Book about Autistic People'. She claimed to have very severe Kanner's autism and to be a savant in writing, music and art. She was an elective mute. This was the very first book to mention "celebration" and "beauty" in connection with autism, and the one that became Amanda Baggs' bible.
Not long afterwards, O'Neill flew off to settle in Hawaii with "the love of her life". She moved on.
In the same year 1999, an association was made between autism and genius. Speculative articles appeared such as, "Was Einstein Autistic?", followed by articles such as The Little Professor Syndrome, New York Times Magazine, June 18, 2000.
Frank Klein, then aged 29, apparently read the article which he said "explained everything" and led him a year later to Pittsburgh University and a diagnosis of High Functioning Autism.
He then set up his "Asperger's Advocacy" website which he later changed to "Autism Advocacy" when he said he realized he was more High Functioning than an Aspie. And, amongst other articles, such as, "Don't Cure Autism Now!" and "The Truth of The Myth of The Lack of Autism Recovery", he wrote "Autism, Genius and Greatness".
Then after four years of advocacy, he moved on.
In the meantime Judy Singer coined the word "Neurodiversity" and linked autism to "Nerds Wierdos, and OddBalls" in 1999.
Autistics.org was created by Laura Tisoncik, and Amanda Baggs joined her in 1999/2000.
Then Baron-Cohen's Aspie quizzes appeared, and screening for autism and Aspergers in younger and younger children began. The idea of an ASD which soon became "Autism" was extended to include any toddler with speech delay or shyness, and any shy or socially awkward teen with special interests.
Jim Laidler the ex-DAN! doctor who posted on autism support forums that his two sons had been damaged by vaccines and how they had made great progress after chelation - which is why Dr Rimland chose him to write the DAN! position paper on Mercury Detoxification of Autistic Children in 2001 - turned Judas a year later and joined Quackwatch, starting up his own branch of the organization named Autism-Watch. He had recanted and returned to the fold. Had he ever really left?
In 2002 Edan, diagnosed with Aspergers in 2001, created the website "Aspergia".
He writes:
"At school they are often viewed as normal children, if a little awkward or introverted but childhood and adolescence are such turbulent years anyway that many AMs (Aspergian Mutants) are missed completely". "AM children often develop some special powers too."
"When AM (Aspergian Mutant) individuals combine their strong personal focus with their special power, they have an extraordinary potential to contribute to society and develop new and striking inventions and works of art or science. Further research is required in the field of history to find out how many central innovative figures in human history did indeed have Aspergian traits."
In 2004 Edan moved on.
Bonnie Ventura, and many others, who found Edan's site about "Aspergians", and as a self-identified "Aspergian", jumped on board with her ideas, for one - a site for science fiction writers, which generated much more online Aspie traffic.
The idea that a cure for autism would lead to abortion of autistic fetuses and genocide of a whole race (a superior race - the next step in human evolution) was brilliant! It had anti-abortionists and minority groups up-in-arms, and had, and still has, many people who know a child with an ASD concerned, and self-diagnosed Aspies quaking in their boots.
In 2004, the "Aspies for Freedom" forum was created by Amy and Gareth Nelson, which has the wholehearted support of Simon Baron-Cohen and Tony Attwood, the UK and Australasian autism experts.
In the same year, Kathleen Seidel's undoubtedly pro-vaccination, Neurodiversity.com sprang into action with links to Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch and Laidler's Autism-Watch - which has links back to Neurodiversity.com, Autism Diva and other ND sites and blogs. Simon Baron-Cohen is in touch with Seidel, and he has praised her for her efforts. This year in the March edition of the British Medical Journal he said, "I'm very impressed by the scholarship in the neurodiversity.com website".
Now the word "autism" appears regularly in our newspapers, often linked with genius and giftedness. There must be literally hundreds of books about autism, many of them written by "autistics" or parents of "autistics" who are painting an entirely different picture of autism. I hear that Uta Frith and Simon Baron Cohen have enthusiastically supported "autistic" authors.
We have certainly come a long way since 1988 and the movie Rainman. Aspies today are surprised when they discover that the character, Raymond Babbit, was inspired by the life of the real autistic-savant Kim Peek, and that at the time Kim Peek was regarded as a high-functioning autistic.
Since 1999, several films have been made, and others are on the way, such as the Jason McElwain Movie, all depicting a different kind of autism that wasn't familiar even ten years ago.
Ten years ago, who would have guessed that the president of the USA would be photographed with an autistic basketball player? Who then could have imagined that a young man with autism would be able to play basketball - a fast-paced team sport, with the high-level activity and noise that the game entails?
Since 1999, the face of autism has been and is being deliberately changed.
Let's return to 1999. By that time, the rate of autism had climbed to 1 in 166, and many parents of children with regressive autism were waiting impatiently for the rate of autism to drop after the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. They knew it would take a few years, but they were sure that it would happen. To see a decline in the rate would have been positive proof that a substance repeatedly injected into children's bodies had damaged their brains. Unfortunately, for us and our children, that could never be allowed to happen.
The numbers kept rising, and are still rising. Last month Simon Baron-Cohen announced that autism now affects 1 in 58 children.
To the public that means that 1 in 58 children have autism. They don't. Simon Baron-Cohen knows that 1 in 58 children don't have autism. It is a deliberate deception to keep the rate of "Autism" skyrocketing in the public eye.
Joe and Jane Public read their newspaper, see the numbers rising, and completely dismiss the idea that vaccines cause autism. Their doctor has assured them that vaccines are safe, and warned them that without vaccination their baby could die or be severely brain-damaged from "a preventable disease". They've also read that Einstein, Michelangelo and Jane Austin had autism, and they've heard that autistic children are highly intelligent, gifted, and might even have special powers. They wonder what all the fuss is about. There's no question that they will vaccinate their baby.
O'Neill, Edan and Klein have moved on. How many of the current Neurodiversity activists will move on and get on with their lives, leaving their advocacy behind? Parents don't just advocate for their children with autism for a few years and move on. They can't. It's a life-time commitment.
What was and is the Neurodiversity movement's real aim? Looking at the timeline, what do you think?
Part 2
Part 3
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Question for President Obama re: Gupta
Mr Obama,
Did you know that Sanjay Gupta perpetrated a fraud on autistic children by allowing Amanda Baggs to go on his TV program and lie to the public about autism?
Amanda Baggs is an actress who was hired by a pharamaceutical company propaganda group. She used lots of LSD and wound up in a nuthouse. Several years later, at age 19, she began promoting herself as a low functioning autistic person who claimed she loved having a damaged brain and did not want to be cured of autism.
Several of us wrote to CNN, called them, commented on Gupta's blog, to alert him to the fact that Baggs was a fraud. Gupta, in a subsequent broadcast, tried to make excuses for the fraud we had discovered and again presented Baggs to the public to obscure the truth about how seriously damaged autistic childrens' brains became due to thimerosal in vaccines.
Knowing that Gupta has played this role in preventing parents of autistic children from learning the truth about autism, do you think it's a good idea to hire this fucking liar as Surgeon General?
Did you know that Sanjay Gupta perpetrated a fraud on autistic children by allowing Amanda Baggs to go on his TV program and lie to the public about autism?
Amanda Baggs is an actress who was hired by a pharamaceutical company propaganda group. She used lots of LSD and wound up in a nuthouse. Several years later, at age 19, she began promoting herself as a low functioning autistic person who claimed she loved having a damaged brain and did not want to be cured of autism.
Several of us wrote to CNN, called them, commented on Gupta's blog, to alert him to the fact that Baggs was a fraud. Gupta, in a subsequent broadcast, tried to make excuses for the fraud we had discovered and again presented Baggs to the public to obscure the truth about how seriously damaged autistic childrens' brains became due to thimerosal in vaccines.
Knowing that Gupta has played this role in preventing parents of autistic children from learning the truth about autism, do you think it's a good idea to hire this fucking liar as Surgeon General?
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
Ari Ne'eman's Partner in Hate Crimes
"Life with Asperger's: One Man Tells His Story"
Published in The Bergen Record newspaper.
September 29, 2006
My name is Scott Michael Robertson. I'm a 26-year-old third-year Ph.D. student studying information sciences and technology at Penn State University.
I'm different from my friends and peers in graduate school in that I have Asperger's syndrome, a disorder on the autism spectrum. I self-diagnosed with AS in 1999. Six years later, a doctor confirmed my diagnosis."
Wow, the similarity to Amanda Baggs is amazing. Ari Ne'eman replaced Baggs as Neurodiversity's spokesmodel after I destroyed her fraudulent act. Now, we see that Ne'eman's partner in abusing autistic people diagnosed himself in the same year that Baggs dug up her diagnosis. What could have possibly caused people born in 1980 to catch an autistic spectrum disorder 19 years later and then have both of them become autistic child abusers? It must be genetic.
It took this Robertson six years to find a doctor to agree he was screwed up enough to win the Asperger's diagnosis. So, we can assume that he wasn't so screwed up that it bothered his parents enough to think he had this diminished mental capacity known as Asperger's. Maybe he had neglectful parents, who knows?
The point is that Robertson purports to represent my son who was so screwed up that he was diagnosed at age one. Robertson is not being honest about autism.
I found this curious record on my stat counter last night that looks like it came from the same school that Robertson is associated with. I have no idea what it all means as I know virtually nothing about computers. Maybe someone who is computer literate will find it interesting.
64.178.106.242.dynamic.dejazzd.com
IP Address 64.178.106.242 [Label IP Address]
Country United States
Region Pennsylvania
City State College
ISP D&e Communications
Returning Visits 0
Visit Length 10 hours 23 mins 34 secs
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser Firefox 3.0.5
Operating System
Resolution Unknown
Javascript Enabled
Navigation Path
Date Time WebPage
6th January 2009 11:47:34 No referring link
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic.html
6th January 2009 11:53:02 hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic.html
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-complaint-filed-with-ftc.html
6th January 2009 20:02:56 No referring link
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-complaint-filed-with-ftc.html
6th January 2009 20:03:19 No referring link
hatingautism.blogspot.com/
6th January 2009 20:24:20 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/sitesucker/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic-1728.html
6th January 2009 20:24:36 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/sitesucker/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic-25754.html
6th January 2009 20:36:48 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008/08/words-from-prophet.html
6th January 2009 20:38:53 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008_12_01_archive.html
6th January 2009 20:41:23 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008_06_01_archive.html
6th January 2009 20:43:43 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-will-umbc-do-about-ari-neeman-29128.html
6th January 2009 20:53:23 hatingautism.blogspot.com/
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-will-umbc-do-about-ari-neeman.html
Published in The Bergen Record newspaper.
September 29, 2006
My name is Scott Michael Robertson. I'm a 26-year-old third-year Ph.D. student studying information sciences and technology at Penn State University.
I'm different from my friends and peers in graduate school in that I have Asperger's syndrome, a disorder on the autism spectrum. I self-diagnosed with AS in 1999. Six years later, a doctor confirmed my diagnosis."
Wow, the similarity to Amanda Baggs is amazing. Ari Ne'eman replaced Baggs as Neurodiversity's spokesmodel after I destroyed her fraudulent act. Now, we see that Ne'eman's partner in abusing autistic people diagnosed himself in the same year that Baggs dug up her diagnosis. What could have possibly caused people born in 1980 to catch an autistic spectrum disorder 19 years later and then have both of them become autistic child abusers? It must be genetic.
It took this Robertson six years to find a doctor to agree he was screwed up enough to win the Asperger's diagnosis. So, we can assume that he wasn't so screwed up that it bothered his parents enough to think he had this diminished mental capacity known as Asperger's. Maybe he had neglectful parents, who knows?
The point is that Robertson purports to represent my son who was so screwed up that he was diagnosed at age one. Robertson is not being honest about autism.
I found this curious record on my stat counter last night that looks like it came from the same school that Robertson is associated with. I have no idea what it all means as I know virtually nothing about computers. Maybe someone who is computer literate will find it interesting.
64.178.106.242.dynamic.dejazzd.com
IP Address 64.178.106.242 [Label IP Address]
Country United States
Region Pennsylvania
City State College
ISP D&e Communications
Returning Visits 0
Visit Length 10 hours 23 mins 34 secs
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser Firefox 3.0.5
Operating System
Resolution Unknown
Javascript Enabled
Navigation Path
Date Time WebPage
6th January 2009 11:47:34 No referring link
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic.html
6th January 2009 11:53:02 hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic.html
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-complaint-filed-with-ftc.html
6th January 2009 20:02:56 No referring link
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-complaint-filed-with-ftc.html
6th January 2009 20:03:19 No referring link
hatingautism.blogspot.com/
6th January 2009 20:24:20 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/sitesucker/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic-1728.html
6th January 2009 20:24:36 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/sitesucker/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/ari-neeman-thief-steals-from-autistic-25754.html
6th January 2009 20:36:48 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008/08/words-from-prophet.html
6th January 2009 20:38:53 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008_12_01_archive.html
6th January 2009 20:41:23 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008_06_01_archive.html
6th January 2009 20:43:43 No referring link
/Users/scottrobertson/Downloads/suck/hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-will-umbc-do-about-ari-neeman-29128.html
6th January 2009 20:53:23 hatingautism.blogspot.com/
hatingautism.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-will-umbc-do-about-ari-neeman.html
What Will UMBC Do About Ari Ne'eman
UMBC responded. I guess Dr Hrabowski didn't feel like avoiding the issue himself so some guy namd David Gleason wrote me a letter. The nitwit Gleason wrote some BS and ended with this: "While you and others may disagree with Ari's point of view, his advocacy work is consistent with this framework and the freedom of speech that is a core value in the academy and in our nation."
Mr Gleason must have learned the comedy routine from the famous comedian with the same surname. Gleason pretends to not notice the fact that Ne'eman's advocacy is a blatant lie by pretending he also can not understand the difference between autism and Asperger's syndrome that I clearly spelled out in my letter below. David Gleason here tells me that UMBC approves of their students committing fraud that harms low functioning autistic children and tries to justify it by slinging "freedom of speech" at me.
Well Mr Gleason, I have the same freedom of speech to point out that your BS in this matter means that UMBC just doesn't give a damn about teaching their students anything about ethics. Your refusal to tame the monster you have created by ignoring his extremely unethical behavior means he will be free to harm more children like my severely disabled son with his blatant lies. I can only hope other parents see how UMBC encourages their students to abuse autistic children so they may send them to a more reputable college.
I sent this letter to Dr Freeman Hrabowski III, President of the University of Maryland Baltimore Campus to alert him to the deviant sophistry practiced by one of his students, Ari Ne'eman. It should be interesting to see his reply.
Dear Dr Hrabowski,
I notice that you have an interest in Civil Rights. One of your students, Ari Ne'eman,
is using some extremely devious sophistry to stomp on the Civil Rights of my son, a
severely autistic 12 year old boy who can't speak to speak for himself. Young Mr Ne'eman
is also abusing the Civil Rights of tens of thousands of other severely autistic people
who also do not have the ability to speak.
Your Mr Ne'eman even has the chutzpah to try to foist himself off as a civil rights
advocate himself while he tramples on the disabled children. Back in the 1960's, I
helped out the Black Panthers in a legitimate civil rights struggle. For Ne'eman to
claim that he is standing up for my son's civil rights would be akin to the Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan claiming to represent the Black Panthers.
Ari Ne'eman is an intelligent young man with Asperger's syndrome, a condition vastly
different from the autism my son suffers from. Mr Ne'eman has been engaging in a warped
brand of advocacy where he runs around claiming that severely disabled children like my
son should not be cured. When he engages in this warped advocacy, he tries to pawn
himself off as autistic. Ne'eman is cleverly deceiving many people by bastardizing the
true meaning of autism when he assigns that definition to himself, a man who is quite
capable intellectually and has nothing in common with a 12 year old who can't read,
write, or use a toilet.
My son is one of those extremely damaged boys who smears feces, Dr Hrabowski. I have
cleaned that feces off the walls of my house hundreds of times. For Mr Ne'eman to claim
that boys like my son, not only should not be cured but, that they do not want to be
cured themselves is some seriously depraved sophistry. Ne'eman has presented this
deranged version of autism to President elect Obama's team. Painting autism is the wrong
light will be damaging to all of those children like my son who would desperately love to
be able to speak, read, write and become adults who do not have to wear diapers.
Before Mr Ne'eman does any more damage to the public perception of how truly borrible
autism is, I respectfully request that you suspend his regular classes and do something
about teaching this young man the basics of ethical behavior. For UMBC to produce
monsters like Ne'eman who would abuse disabled children does not speak well for your
school.
Thank you,
John Best
113 Old Derry Rd
Londonderry, NH 03053
(603)434-3928
Mr Gleason must have learned the comedy routine from the famous comedian with the same surname. Gleason pretends to not notice the fact that Ne'eman's advocacy is a blatant lie by pretending he also can not understand the difference between autism and Asperger's syndrome that I clearly spelled out in my letter below. David Gleason here tells me that UMBC approves of their students committing fraud that harms low functioning autistic children and tries to justify it by slinging "freedom of speech" at me.
Well Mr Gleason, I have the same freedom of speech to point out that your BS in this matter means that UMBC just doesn't give a damn about teaching their students anything about ethics. Your refusal to tame the monster you have created by ignoring his extremely unethical behavior means he will be free to harm more children like my severely disabled son with his blatant lies. I can only hope other parents see how UMBC encourages their students to abuse autistic children so they may send them to a more reputable college.
I sent this letter to Dr Freeman Hrabowski III, President of the University of Maryland Baltimore Campus to alert him to the deviant sophistry practiced by one of his students, Ari Ne'eman. It should be interesting to see his reply.
Dear Dr Hrabowski,
I notice that you have an interest in Civil Rights. One of your students, Ari Ne'eman,
is using some extremely devious sophistry to stomp on the Civil Rights of my son, a
severely autistic 12 year old boy who can't speak to speak for himself. Young Mr Ne'eman
is also abusing the Civil Rights of tens of thousands of other severely autistic people
who also do not have the ability to speak.
Your Mr Ne'eman even has the chutzpah to try to foist himself off as a civil rights
advocate himself while he tramples on the disabled children. Back in the 1960's, I
helped out the Black Panthers in a legitimate civil rights struggle. For Ne'eman to
claim that he is standing up for my son's civil rights would be akin to the Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan claiming to represent the Black Panthers.
Ari Ne'eman is an intelligent young man with Asperger's syndrome, a condition vastly
different from the autism my son suffers from. Mr Ne'eman has been engaging in a warped
brand of advocacy where he runs around claiming that severely disabled children like my
son should not be cured. When he engages in this warped advocacy, he tries to pawn
himself off as autistic. Ne'eman is cleverly deceiving many people by bastardizing the
true meaning of autism when he assigns that definition to himself, a man who is quite
capable intellectually and has nothing in common with a 12 year old who can't read,
write, or use a toilet.
My son is one of those extremely damaged boys who smears feces, Dr Hrabowski. I have
cleaned that feces off the walls of my house hundreds of times. For Mr Ne'eman to claim
that boys like my son, not only should not be cured but, that they do not want to be
cured themselves is some seriously depraved sophistry. Ne'eman has presented this
deranged version of autism to President elect Obama's team. Painting autism is the wrong
light will be damaging to all of those children like my son who would desperately love to
be able to speak, read, write and become adults who do not have to wear diapers.
Before Mr Ne'eman does any more damage to the public perception of how truly borrible
autism is, I respectfully request that you suspend his regular classes and do something
about teaching this young man the basics of ethical behavior. For UMBC to produce
monsters like Ne'eman who would abuse disabled children does not speak well for your
school.
Thank you,
John Best
113 Old Derry Rd
Londonderry, NH 03053
(603)434-3928
Ari Ne'eman, Complaint Filed With FTC
I filed a complaint with the FTC today against Ari Ne'eman and his bogus ASAN charity. This bastard is misrepresenting our autistic children and trying to defraud the public out of money to help him towards that end. Filing more complaints against Ne'eman is easy. Just go to the FTC, give then this link to describe Ne'emans devious and dishonest actions and the whole process takes less than 10 minutes.
It's time we took action to stop Neurodiverse psychopaths from spreading bogus information about autism.
It's time we took action to stop Neurodiverse psychopaths from spreading bogus information about autism.
Monday, January 05, 2009
Ari Ne'eman, Thief Steals from Autistic People
Ari Ne'eman has set up a sham charity called the Autistic Self Advocacy Network. The page on Change.org where he tries to steal money that's meant to help autistic people says this: "The Autistic Self-Advocacy Network (ASAN) is a non-profit organization run by and for autistic people. ASAN's supporters include autistic adults and youth, those with other distinct neurological ty...Read More" So far, this young thief has only misappropriated $305 from the 121 mental cases who joined his cause but the money is not the big issue here.
Ne'eman has become the spokesmodel for Neurodiversity, which is an arm of Quackbusters, an arm of Pharma. His ASAN is an offshoot of Neurodiversity. ASAN is not run by any autistic people. It is run by people with Asperger's. People with autism could no more run a charity than they could swim across the Pacific. Most of them can't even write their names.
ASAN is simply a cover that claims to support people when the fact is that it is trying to abuse people with autism. Giving money to ASAN to help autistic people is like giving money to the Red Sox and being told it will be used to help the Yankees.
ASAN took credit for waging a battle of propaganda to force NYU to end an ad campaign last year that was designed to raise autism awareneess. NYU had some billboards that described the true horror of autism, something ASAN is trying to hide. Unfortunately, so many psychopaths associated with ASAN bombarded NYU with disingenuous letters that NYU was stupid enough to buckle to this apparent pressure from the autism community and remove the ads.
The fact of the matter was that the autism community liked the ads. The letters that were sent to NYU came from people who are trying to prevent anyone from curing autism. These psychopaths only claim to be autistic. They aren't. Some of them, like Ne'eman have the Asperger's diagnosis which basically means that they are a little bit screwy but can function like anyone else. People with autism have had their brains turned to mush by vaccines and most of them can't even tie their shoes, use a toilet, read, write or be left alone for a minute without someone watching them.
Ne'eman and his group are trying to fool the public by presenting a false image of autism. The aim seems to be to make people believe that those with low functioning autism don't even exist. That's why they try to blur that distinction between the autism and Asperger's diagnosis. They think that it is acceptable to call themselves autistic because Asperger's is on what is known as the Autism Spectrum. So they bastardize "Autism Spectrum" into "autistic" which is the proper name for those completely helpless people that I described. This can only be intentional deception for no person with Asperger's would ever put "autistic" on a job application to conjure up images of the boss having to change their diapers 5 times a day.
The ultimate reason for this deception can only be to make the Vaccine Industry look good at the expense of those low-functioning autistic people. For, if ASAN and their psychopaths can raise enough money to advance more campaigns to spread their propaganda to the general public, the unwitting public will easily be misled.
One of the overt goals of ASAN is to spread the deranged notion that nobody with autism should be cured. These sadists include those low functioning kids who smear feces all over themselves in that group that they claim does not want to be cured. Of course, the non-verbal autistic people can not speak for themselves and anyone who challenges these sadists and their deranged rhetoric is immediately accused of hate speech. Yes, parents who try to speak for low functioning autistic kids are routinely accused of hating everyone with autism for trying to cure them.
None of this makes any sense once you look at all of it but the media has been happy to allow Ne'eman to go on TV and spread this insane propaganda. They don't allow parents of the actual autistic kids the chance to refute this insaniity. So, the public buys it and, pretty soon, these psychopaths could have a sizeable warchest to finance their campaign to misinform the world about autism. They have Ne'eman to present to the world, who looks just strange enough with his eye abnormalities that the world just might buy it.
Where does this leave those autistic kids who are in dire need of being cured, a cure that already exists for some? The bogus publicity that Ne'eman might gain could prevent parents of those kids from learning the truth.
This nonsense has gone on long enough. We need some legal talent to put an end to it. Intentionally blurring that distincttion between autism and Asperger's has to stop. It is being used for evil purposes.
Here's the video of Ne'eman and Kristina Chew again. Watch closely when they interview Ne'eman. Watch how fast his eyes blink while he's trying to answer questions. It's obvious he's lying. Watch the sneer on his face at 0:54 seconds when the subject of trying to cure the low functioning autistics comes up. He has an answer already figured out. He says anti-cure doesn't mean anti progress.
If you read some of Ne'eman's propaganda, you'll see that he has wonderful things to say about how autistics need education, services, etc but he will not admit that kids have already been cured. He will not tell you that these low functioning kids like mine are so pathetic and helpless that no education does them a bit of good. Medical treatments that cure some of the autism is the only thing that helps these kids at all. Without those treatments to address the damage the vaccines did to their brains, those kids like mine have no chance. That's exactly what Ne'eman wants, for those kids to remain "vegetables" their entire lives.
Somebody please tell me how to report this sham charity?
Ne'eman has become the spokesmodel for Neurodiversity, which is an arm of Quackbusters, an arm of Pharma. His ASAN is an offshoot of Neurodiversity. ASAN is not run by any autistic people. It is run by people with Asperger's. People with autism could no more run a charity than they could swim across the Pacific. Most of them can't even write their names.
ASAN is simply a cover that claims to support people when the fact is that it is trying to abuse people with autism. Giving money to ASAN to help autistic people is like giving money to the Red Sox and being told it will be used to help the Yankees.
ASAN took credit for waging a battle of propaganda to force NYU to end an ad campaign last year that was designed to raise autism awareneess. NYU had some billboards that described the true horror of autism, something ASAN is trying to hide. Unfortunately, so many psychopaths associated with ASAN bombarded NYU with disingenuous letters that NYU was stupid enough to buckle to this apparent pressure from the autism community and remove the ads.
The fact of the matter was that the autism community liked the ads. The letters that were sent to NYU came from people who are trying to prevent anyone from curing autism. These psychopaths only claim to be autistic. They aren't. Some of them, like Ne'eman have the Asperger's diagnosis which basically means that they are a little bit screwy but can function like anyone else. People with autism have had their brains turned to mush by vaccines and most of them can't even tie their shoes, use a toilet, read, write or be left alone for a minute without someone watching them.
Ne'eman and his group are trying to fool the public by presenting a false image of autism. The aim seems to be to make people believe that those with low functioning autism don't even exist. That's why they try to blur that distinction between the autism and Asperger's diagnosis. They think that it is acceptable to call themselves autistic because Asperger's is on what is known as the Autism Spectrum. So they bastardize "Autism Spectrum" into "autistic" which is the proper name for those completely helpless people that I described. This can only be intentional deception for no person with Asperger's would ever put "autistic" on a job application to conjure up images of the boss having to change their diapers 5 times a day.
The ultimate reason for this deception can only be to make the Vaccine Industry look good at the expense of those low-functioning autistic people. For, if ASAN and their psychopaths can raise enough money to advance more campaigns to spread their propaganda to the general public, the unwitting public will easily be misled.
One of the overt goals of ASAN is to spread the deranged notion that nobody with autism should be cured. These sadists include those low functioning kids who smear feces all over themselves in that group that they claim does not want to be cured. Of course, the non-verbal autistic people can not speak for themselves and anyone who challenges these sadists and their deranged rhetoric is immediately accused of hate speech. Yes, parents who try to speak for low functioning autistic kids are routinely accused of hating everyone with autism for trying to cure them.
None of this makes any sense once you look at all of it but the media has been happy to allow Ne'eman to go on TV and spread this insane propaganda. They don't allow parents of the actual autistic kids the chance to refute this insaniity. So, the public buys it and, pretty soon, these psychopaths could have a sizeable warchest to finance their campaign to misinform the world about autism. They have Ne'eman to present to the world, who looks just strange enough with his eye abnormalities that the world just might buy it.
Where does this leave those autistic kids who are in dire need of being cured, a cure that already exists for some? The bogus publicity that Ne'eman might gain could prevent parents of those kids from learning the truth.
This nonsense has gone on long enough. We need some legal talent to put an end to it. Intentionally blurring that distincttion between autism and Asperger's has to stop. It is being used for evil purposes.
Here's the video of Ne'eman and Kristina Chew again. Watch closely when they interview Ne'eman. Watch how fast his eyes blink while he's trying to answer questions. It's obvious he's lying. Watch the sneer on his face at 0:54 seconds when the subject of trying to cure the low functioning autistics comes up. He has an answer already figured out. He says anti-cure doesn't mean anti progress.
If you read some of Ne'eman's propaganda, you'll see that he has wonderful things to say about how autistics need education, services, etc but he will not admit that kids have already been cured. He will not tell you that these low functioning kids like mine are so pathetic and helpless that no education does them a bit of good. Medical treatments that cure some of the autism is the only thing that helps these kids at all. Without those treatments to address the damage the vaccines did to their brains, those kids like mine have no chance. That's exactly what Ne'eman wants, for those kids to remain "vegetables" their entire lives.
Somebody please tell me how to report this sham charity?
Sunday, January 04, 2009
Change.org Encourages Sexual Deviates to Attack Autistic Children
Marc Rosen is a sexual pervert who is on a mission to disseminate false information about autism. An article about this gay mental case shows how his diagnosis has been changed numerous times. Similar to the fraud, Amanda Baggs, this pervert who "sodomizes" autistic children is so bizarre that it has been impossible for any professionals to agree which category of lunatic to put him in.
We can see from this quote from the artcle: "An autistic person often is said to think outside the box, or deliberately cross the line. I can tell you from experience that we don't. To us, there's no box, there's no line." that Rosen is missing what Sigmund Freud called the Superego. This is how psychopaths are grown. They do not have any conscience so that they can not determine right from wrong.
We also learned from Dr Freud that homosexuality is a mental illness that is caused by boys failing to master the Oedipus Complex. So, if Freud had had Marc Rosen as a patient he would have regarded Rosen as "Patients are nothing but riff-raff. The only useful purposes they serve are to help us earn a living and to provide learning material. In any case, we cannot help them." Sigmund Freud. I have to agree with Freud that perverts like Marc Rosen are beyond help. Nevertheless, that does not give the perverts the right to invade forums about autism to spread their mentally deranged perspectives.
I wrote to Ben Rattray, Founder and CEO of Change.org to alert him to the deviants who had infested his site's blogs to tout bogus and damaging information about autism. Rattray did not reply. By ignoring what I told him, Rattray tacitly agreed that perverts like Marc Rosen should spread insane propaganda designed to prevent the general public from learning the truth about autism. Rattray, or one of his subordinates are also responsible for deleting my comments that were in opposition to perverts who try to harm autistic children. And, Rattray or a subordinate also banned me from Change.org without even bothering to give me any notice or explanation. I'll have to assume that Rattray only allows a voice to perverts and liars to aide them in their quest of preventing the general public from learning the truth about how the United States Government approved the poisoning of our infants to cause the brain damage known as autism.
We can see from this quote from the artcle: "An autistic person often is said to think outside the box, or deliberately cross the line. I can tell you from experience that we don't. To us, there's no box, there's no line." that Rosen is missing what Sigmund Freud called the Superego. This is how psychopaths are grown. They do not have any conscience so that they can not determine right from wrong.
We also learned from Dr Freud that homosexuality is a mental illness that is caused by boys failing to master the Oedipus Complex. So, if Freud had had Marc Rosen as a patient he would have regarded Rosen as "Patients are nothing but riff-raff. The only useful purposes they serve are to help us earn a living and to provide learning material. In any case, we cannot help them." Sigmund Freud. I have to agree with Freud that perverts like Marc Rosen are beyond help. Nevertheless, that does not give the perverts the right to invade forums about autism to spread their mentally deranged perspectives.
I wrote to Ben Rattray, Founder and CEO of Change.org to alert him to the deviants who had infested his site's blogs to tout bogus and damaging information about autism. Rattray did not reply. By ignoring what I told him, Rattray tacitly agreed that perverts like Marc Rosen should spread insane propaganda designed to prevent the general public from learning the truth about autism. Rattray, or one of his subordinates are also responsible for deleting my comments that were in opposition to perverts who try to harm autistic children. And, Rattray or a subordinate also banned me from Change.org without even bothering to give me any notice or explanation. I'll have to assume that Rattray only allows a voice to perverts and liars to aide them in their quest of preventing the general public from learning the truth about how the United States Government approved the poisoning of our infants to cause the brain damage known as autism.
Saturday, January 03, 2009
Change.org, Neurodiversity Defeated Again and the Scumbag Ari Ne'eman
The Neuroinsane have now managed to have my comments deleted from the Autism blog at Change.org. Actually, I think most of the comments remain but, instead of having my name next to them, some weasel replaced my name with my initials. Here is how the comments looked before Chew started deleting the truth.
The child abusers, led by Kristina Chew, surrendered to me after only one day of battle. These psychopathic liars could not refute one word I said so they had to try the usual assaults of name calling and character assassination. In the end, they had to throw in the towel and go crying to some authority at Change.org to have me thrown out.
Update: I went back to change.org to check the comments there to see that Chew and her lying psychopaths had all of my comments deleted. That's very cowardly of you Kristina. You can run but you can't hide. These lying scum had to delete about 100 comments because they couldn't face one man, me.
We can see here that the lying Mrs Chew thanked me for one of my many comments but that comment can't be found now. Why would an honest person thank me and then delete my words? Neurodiversity must be very afraid.
@John Best,Thanks for the comment.
Thank you very much----
Posted by Kristina Chew on 01/02/2009 @ 04:37PM PST
The liars of Neurodiversity will never win any battle against decent parents. Kevin Leitch, Phil Schwarz, Chew, a super moron named Marc Rosen and a band of assorted idiots tried their best to fend off sanity with dishonest rhetoric but, as always, had to have my voice banned so they could present their dishonest and deranged agenda unopposed.
And, here's a nice example of two mental cases breathing a sigh of relief that I had been banned:
John is fondly called John Beast, and he treats his kid like a lab rat. Expect only bile and hatred from him.
given by Mark Probert in reference to comment on the Autism blog entry 10 Autism Controversies
I know what he's like. Thankfully, it looks like he's been banned.
Posted by Marc Rosen (Mental Case, not autistic) on 01/03/2009 @ 05:51PM PST
My favorite act of cowardice from the Neuropsychopaths involved their newest lying spokesmodel, the young college student, Ari Ne'eman.
Here is the comment I left for the dishonest young bastard, Ne'eman this morning that has now been deleted:
Ari Ne'eman is a blatant liar. He refers to himself as autistic when, in fact, he has Asperger's. He was diagnosed so late in life that I question the Asperger's too.
If Ne'eman was trying to be honest, he would call his organization the Asperger's self advocacy network. By using the word "autism" in the title and ranting against a cure, Ne'eman pretends to speak for autistic children who smear feces all over themselves, bite themselves into bloody messes, bash their heads on concrete, never learn to read or write and eventually spend their adult lives locked up in asylums.
We have already cured many of these children who used to be thought of as hopeless cases. So, using Ne'eman's logic, we can assume he would like to reinject the mercury into them that we removed so they could go back to enjoying smearing feces all over themselves.
Ne'eman has been schooled by a deranged group of psychopaths known as Neurodiversity (Neuroinsanity to me) who are on a propaganda mission to prevent people from learning how to cure autism.
These psychopaths could not stop me from curing my son and the world needs to know that there is no truth in what they say, starting with calling themselves "autistic".
Posted by John Best on 01/03/2009 @ 04:33AM PST
This comment in response must have come from a friend of Ne'eman and now looks ridiculous standing there by itself:
Please do not infest this site with your horrifically childish and under educated statements, Mr Best. Asperger's Syndrome is a part of the wider condition of Autism. To deny this medical fact confirmed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defies description.
Posted by Kylie Perez on 01/03/2009 @ 02:53PM PST
As we easily see, this Kylie Perez is either not very bright with this ad hominem attack on me or he, she or it is just one more lying piece of dung from Neuroinsanity. Perez pretends that the distinction between autism and Asperger's is immaterial.
I clearly showed how the lying Ari Ne'eman intentionally blurs that distinction to serve his autistic abusing agenda. I have to laugh when this simpleton who must agree that disabled children should not be cured refers to me as under educated. The liar, Ari Ne'eman might fool some under educated people but he is not going to sling his obfuscatory rhetoric past me.
I'll state here for the record that Ari Ne'eman is a fraud who is intentionally abusing autistic children by misrepresenting the facts about autism. This up and coming young liar sems to think he is going to somehow influence President Obama on policy regarding autism. That can not be allowed to happen. For, if the liar, Ari Ne'eman is allowed to speak for our children, our children will lose.
Here's the video of Ne'eman trying to tell the nation to let our children rot.
The child abusers, led by Kristina Chew, surrendered to me after only one day of battle. These psychopathic liars could not refute one word I said so they had to try the usual assaults of name calling and character assassination. In the end, they had to throw in the towel and go crying to some authority at Change.org to have me thrown out.
Update: I went back to change.org to check the comments there to see that Chew and her lying psychopaths had all of my comments deleted. That's very cowardly of you Kristina. You can run but you can't hide. These lying scum had to delete about 100 comments because they couldn't face one man, me.
We can see here that the lying Mrs Chew thanked me for one of my many comments but that comment can't be found now. Why would an honest person thank me and then delete my words? Neurodiversity must be very afraid.
@John Best,Thanks for the comment.
Thank you very much----
Posted by Kristina Chew on 01/02/2009 @ 04:37PM PST
The liars of Neurodiversity will never win any battle against decent parents. Kevin Leitch, Phil Schwarz, Chew, a super moron named Marc Rosen and a band of assorted idiots tried their best to fend off sanity with dishonest rhetoric but, as always, had to have my voice banned so they could present their dishonest and deranged agenda unopposed.
And, here's a nice example of two mental cases breathing a sigh of relief that I had been banned:
John is fondly called John Beast, and he treats his kid like a lab rat. Expect only bile and hatred from him.
given by Mark Probert in reference to comment on the Autism blog entry 10 Autism Controversies
I know what he's like. Thankfully, it looks like he's been banned.
Posted by Marc Rosen (Mental Case, not autistic) on 01/03/2009 @ 05:51PM PST
My favorite act of cowardice from the Neuropsychopaths involved their newest lying spokesmodel, the young college student, Ari Ne'eman.
Here is the comment I left for the dishonest young bastard, Ne'eman this morning that has now been deleted:
Ari Ne'eman is a blatant liar. He refers to himself as autistic when, in fact, he has Asperger's. He was diagnosed so late in life that I question the Asperger's too.
If Ne'eman was trying to be honest, he would call his organization the Asperger's self advocacy network. By using the word "autism" in the title and ranting against a cure, Ne'eman pretends to speak for autistic children who smear feces all over themselves, bite themselves into bloody messes, bash their heads on concrete, never learn to read or write and eventually spend their adult lives locked up in asylums.
We have already cured many of these children who used to be thought of as hopeless cases. So, using Ne'eman's logic, we can assume he would like to reinject the mercury into them that we removed so they could go back to enjoying smearing feces all over themselves.
Ne'eman has been schooled by a deranged group of psychopaths known as Neurodiversity (Neuroinsanity to me) who are on a propaganda mission to prevent people from learning how to cure autism.
These psychopaths could not stop me from curing my son and the world needs to know that there is no truth in what they say, starting with calling themselves "autistic".
Posted by John Best on 01/03/2009 @ 04:33AM PST
This comment in response must have come from a friend of Ne'eman and now looks ridiculous standing there by itself:
Please do not infest this site with your horrifically childish and under educated statements, Mr Best. Asperger's Syndrome is a part of the wider condition of Autism. To deny this medical fact confirmed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defies description.
Posted by Kylie Perez on 01/03/2009 @ 02:53PM PST
As we easily see, this Kylie Perez is either not very bright with this ad hominem attack on me or he, she or it is just one more lying piece of dung from Neuroinsanity. Perez pretends that the distinction between autism and Asperger's is immaterial.
I clearly showed how the lying Ari Ne'eman intentionally blurs that distinction to serve his autistic abusing agenda. I have to laugh when this simpleton who must agree that disabled children should not be cured refers to me as under educated. The liar, Ari Ne'eman might fool some under educated people but he is not going to sling his obfuscatory rhetoric past me.
I'll state here for the record that Ari Ne'eman is a fraud who is intentionally abusing autistic children by misrepresenting the facts about autism. This up and coming young liar sems to think he is going to somehow influence President Obama on policy regarding autism. That can not be allowed to happen. For, if the liar, Ari Ne'eman is allowed to speak for our children, our children will lose.
Here's the video of Ne'eman trying to tell the nation to let our children rot.
Video of Neuropsychopath at Change.org
Here is a nice video of a Neuropsychopath on Change.org. So far, it is possible to leave comments without them being deleted. This is a good opportunity to expose these anti-cure scumbags for what they are, abusers of autistic children.
Below is the comment I left under ne'eman's video. It might be deleted there but, not here.
Ari Ne'eman is a blatant liar. He refers to himself as autistic when, in fact, he has Asperger's. He was diagnosed so late in life that I question the Asperger's too.
If Ne'eman was trying to be honest, he would call his organization the Asperger's self advocacy network. By using the word "autism" in the title and ranting against a cure, Ne'eman pretends to speak for autistic children who smear feces all over themselves, bite themselves into bloody messes, bash their heads on concrete, never learn to read or write and eventually spend their adult lives locked up in asylums.
We have already cured many of these children who used to be thought of as hopeless cases. So, using Ne'eman's logic, we can assume he would like to reinject the mercury into them that we removed so they could go back to enjoying smearing feces all over themselves.
Ne'eman has been schooled by a deranged group of psychopaths known as Neurodiversity (Neuroinsanity to me) who are on a propaganda mission to prevent people from learning how to cure autism.
These psychopaths could not stop me from curing my son and the world needs to know that there is no truth in what they say, starting with calling themselves "autistic".
Posted by John Best on 01/03/2009 @ 04:33AM PST
Below is the comment I left under ne'eman's video. It might be deleted there but, not here.
Ari Ne'eman is a blatant liar. He refers to himself as autistic when, in fact, he has Asperger's. He was diagnosed so late in life that I question the Asperger's too.
If Ne'eman was trying to be honest, he would call his organization the Asperger's self advocacy network. By using the word "autism" in the title and ranting against a cure, Ne'eman pretends to speak for autistic children who smear feces all over themselves, bite themselves into bloody messes, bash their heads on concrete, never learn to read or write and eventually spend their adult lives locked up in asylums.
We have already cured many of these children who used to be thought of as hopeless cases. So, using Ne'eman's logic, we can assume he would like to reinject the mercury into them that we removed so they could go back to enjoying smearing feces all over themselves.
Ne'eman has been schooled by a deranged group of psychopaths known as Neurodiversity (Neuroinsanity to me) who are on a propaganda mission to prevent people from learning how to cure autism.
These psychopaths could not stop me from curing my son and the world needs to know that there is no truth in what they say, starting with calling themselves "autistic".
Posted by John Best on 01/03/2009 @ 04:33AM PST
Friday, January 02, 2009
Change.org Pays Kristina Chew to Lie About Autism
This is disgusting! Kristina Chew is now being paid by Change.org to present her lies on a blog for them. Check this link to see how long it takes my comment to be deleted. I will try to find out how to ask Change.org to prevent this psychopathic mother from using our tax money to spread her vicious lies that hurt autistic children.
You can go to www.change.org , click on "about us" at the bottom and then click on Ben Rattray's name to send him a message about Kristina Chew's dishonest and devious writings that try to prevent people from helping autistic children. Thank you.
You can go to www.change.org , click on "about us" at the bottom and then click on Ben Rattray's name to send him a message about Kristina Chew's dishonest and devious writings that try to prevent people from helping autistic children. Thank you.
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Another Question for Mr Obama
This question is currently being defeated by the criminals who poisoned our children. Please vote in favor of giving them justice. Type "thimerosal" in the search box to find it.
"We've known since 1999 that vaccine makers poisoned our babies with thimerosal but Bush did nothing about it.
Will you arrest the CEO's of these companies and put them to death for this crime?"
John Best, Londonderry, NH - Health Care View response Post a response
This submission was flagged because people believe it is inappropriate. Learn more
"We've known since 1999 that vaccine makers poisoned our babies with thimerosal but Bush did nothing about it.
Will you arrest the CEO's of these companies and put them to death for this crime?"
John Best, Londonderry, NH - Health Care View response Post a response
This submission was flagged because people believe it is inappropriate. Learn more
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Obama Asks for Our Concerns Again
Another letter from Tom Daschle asks to hear our concerns. The more comments he hears, the more likely he is to listen.
Dear John,
Over the past two weeks, thousands of people representing all 50 states and every corner of the country have hosted health care discussions in their homes and communities. Just this week, I attended a discussion hosted by the Fire Department in Dublin, Indiana, and one hosted by a Senior Wellness Center in Southeast Washington, D.C.
Leading your discussion was the first step. Equally important, we want to hear back from you. I learned so much from attending discussions this week, and we want to know about your discussions, too.
The President-elect has asked me to share your feedback from these discussions -- that's why your submission is so essential.
Please tell us how your discussion went by visiting http://change.gov/reportback. We need to hear from you as soon as possible -- by Sunday, January 4th, 2009 at the latest -- so we can prepare our report for the President-elect.
Both President-elect Obama and I are committed to reforming the health care system from the grassroots up -- and leaders like you are crucial to that effort.
I'm looking forward to reading your submissions about your Health Care Community Discussions.
Thank you,
Tom
Tom Daschle
Secretary-designate
Department of Health and Human Services
----
Please note that replies to this email will not be answered.
Dear John,
Over the past two weeks, thousands of people representing all 50 states and every corner of the country have hosted health care discussions in their homes and communities. Just this week, I attended a discussion hosted by the Fire Department in Dublin, Indiana, and one hosted by a Senior Wellness Center in Southeast Washington, D.C.
Leading your discussion was the first step. Equally important, we want to hear back from you. I learned so much from attending discussions this week, and we want to know about your discussions, too.
The President-elect has asked me to share your feedback from these discussions -- that's why your submission is so essential.
Please tell us how your discussion went by visiting http://change.gov/reportback. We need to hear from you as soon as possible -- by Sunday, January 4th, 2009 at the latest -- so we can prepare our report for the President-elect.
Both President-elect Obama and I are committed to reforming the health care system from the grassroots up -- and leaders like you are crucial to that effort.
I'm looking forward to reading your submissions about your Health Care Community Discussions.
Thank you,
Tom
Tom Daschle
Secretary-designate
Department of Health and Human Services
----
Please note that replies to this email will not be answered.
Monday, December 29, 2008
Ask Obama to Tell the Truth About Thimerosal
Change.gov has asked for questions for Obama. They claim they will answer them in the New Year. Please vote here for the following question. Go to the search bar, type in autism and you will find lots of questions. The Neuronitwits are hard at work flagging every suggestion to do with vaccines as a cause of autism as inappropriate, so it would be nice to counter their deranged attempt to harm our children.
"President Bush refused to tell the truth about how thimerosal causes autism.
Will you ban the use of thimerosal and tell the public the truth so we can begin curing all of these children who had their brains damaged by thimerosal in vaccines?"
"President Bush refused to tell the truth about how thimerosal causes autism.
Will you ban the use of thimerosal and tell the public the truth so we can begin curing all of these children who had their brains damaged by thimerosal in vaccines?"
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Pure Bullshit, Dr Rima Laibow, Lying Scoundrel
I received this pile of manure in an email from Dr Rima Laibow in which she tries to deny that she is a disinformation agent working against the best interests of children with autism. This is a lot of bullshit for a simple denial.
The fact remains that Dr Laibow is a lying piece of garbage.
Only a lying piece of garbage could possibly take such a strong stand against me for trying to post one simple link to a blog entry that I wrote advising people that voting for any incumbent politician for President was against their best interests. The worst that could have happened if I had been allowed to post that link on Dr Laibow's Yahoo group is that a handful of people might have looked at it. There is an even slimmer chance that my blog entry may have convinced anyone to change their mind a month before the election and vote against Obama and McCain.
So, no matter what Dr Laibow says in her defense, this proven liar is not to be believed. Dr Laibow would have us believe that she is looking out for our best interests by doing her thing with Codex Alimentarius to preserve our access to the vitamin supplements we need to help our autistic children. Yet, she adamantly refuses to allow me to post one bit of information that opposes the same politicians who will allow those supplements to be banned. By banning my opposition to those politicians, Dr Laibow, in essence took a stance in favor of banning those supplements and preventing us from curing our children of autism. By such vile action, Dr Rima Laibow advertised to the world that she is a lying scoundrel who is trying to harm our autistic children with her devious misinformation.
Here's some information on her husband, Gen Stubblebine.
And, here's my exchange of emails with the lying Dr Laibow where she now threatens to sue me:
No, you blogged disinformation which is actionable as both slander and liable. I am curious to know just what makes you think that what you have published IS the truth? Have you seen a single shred of information which substantiates a single one of those accusations? Please be advised that you might want to think again before you continue to present material which is, rather than the truth, blatant lies since that means that you, too, are engaging in slander and liable and are opening yourself to the same legal action that the perpetrators of these lies are. Before you make that mistake, why not write to the perpetrators and ask for the documentation that their absurd assertions rest upon. You will find that there are none.
I am so sorry that you have been misled by disinformation, but that is what has happened.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
***Note here how Dr Laibow tries to avoid the fact that I determined she was a lying sack of dung because she refused to allow the truth about corrupt politicians to be published on her Yahoo group. Instead, she threatens to sue me about things other people wrote about her. This is a ploy used by liars all the time to avoid the truth about themselves.***
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 9:30 AM, bettwice33@juno.com wrote:
Thanks for your email. I blogged the truth about you. Fuck you.
http://hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008/12/pure-bullshit-dr-rima-laibow-lying.html
I'll note here that every email I get from Dr Laibow begs for money and tries to sell me some coffee for $50 a pound. With Maxwell House costing me $2.99 a pound, Dr Laibows coffee seems a bit overpriced.
This is the piece that it appears the lying Dr Laibow is responding to:
Why does Dr. Rima Laibow use psychological warfare techniques?
<<< Back to Codex
When Dr. Rima Laibow first suddenly appeared on the anti-Codex landscape as leader of the newly-formed Natural Solutions Foundation, I began to wonder where she was coming from. Although she seemed to have a straightforward, hands-on approach to internet activism, something seemed to be amiss.
Long-term anti-Codex activist John Hammell had clearly identified the transnational treaties such as WTO, FTAA and CAFTA as integrating Codex language, placing jurisdiction outside of U.S. lawmakers. Yet Dr. Laibow not only ignored this connection, but actively dissuaded her growing community of online supporters from paying any attention to it, especially at the time when CAFTA was being debated in Congress and there was a real possibility of defeating it. (More on this dissuasion below.)
Then I learned that Dr. Laibow was suing Kevin Miller, allegedly for her having provided some funding for his brilliant and powerful video on Codex called “We Become Silent” but, apparently against her wishes, his including the connection to the above-mentioned treaties.
Since then she has engaged her online community in what appears to be a good cause - writing and calling Congress to stop BioShield 2, a truly horrific proposed law. But all discussion of Codex appears to be directing people into a useless diversion, writing and sending letters of “support” for an “alternative” to the Codex vitamin guidelines. We as ordinary people have zero impact on this process, since it is being drawn up by bureaucrats in the Codex delegations whose allegiance is primarily to the pharmaceutical industry. So getting people involved in this process is a wholesale waste of time.
Then I looked carefully at a message she sent to her supporters about Codex several months ago. In it I found the use of carefully-chosen psychologically-charged words, a technique used in psychological warfare tracts developed at U.S. Army Intelligence by a man named Edward G. Lansdale. This technique, called the Semantic Differential, has been used by our intelligence services widely, as part of programs to subvert “enemy” countries and other targets. (I first read about the Semantic Differential in a tract in Covert Intelligence Information Bulletin about psychological warfare used against Grenada, Chile, and Nicaragua.)
The Semantic Differential is a technique which uses culturally important psychologically-charged words to promote a particular point of view or, in the case of psychological warfare, to discredit an enemy. Here Dr. Laibow’s audience is middle-class, health-conscious, intelligent (and somewhat intellectual) Americans.
Here’s the example from Dr. Laibow’s message:
“If you think that your understanding of Codex is being manipulated by words (such as “risk assessment” as a scientific approach of toxicology appropriate to nutrients which are, by definition, non-toxic, for example), distortion (”CAFTA and FTAA have CODEX language in them so they are the same as the CODEX problem”) and distraction (who is a Druid?, who is a witch?, who is “Controlled Opposition”?, who is a CIA Agent?, who is a good person?, who is a bad person?, etc.”) you are right.”
The psychologically-charged words here are “manipulation,” “distortion,” and “distraction.” John Hammell had made the clear connection between CAFTA and Codex, and had accused the Natural Solutions Foundation (Dr. Laibow’s group) and several other organizations of being “controlled opposition groups” – groups taken over by, or owned by, people who appear to be opposed to Codex but who promote useless activism or tell people that there is nothing to worry about. In the above message, Dr. Laibow psychologically marginalizes Hammell’s position, not by refuting it, but by merely using words that do so by their psychological power in our culture among her audience.
Here is another even more dramatic example, from the next paragraph in her message:
“So the infighting and turf wars which have provided this distortion and distraction (and which the Natural Solutions Foundation will not dignify by entering since there is plenty of turf to go around in the world of health freedom) fulfill the role of the bloated and meaningless “news” that keeps us disconnected both from reality and from its meaning.”
Note the lead-in, using the psychologically-charged words “infighting” and “turf wars” before repeating the words “distortion” and “distraction.” She goes on to say that *her* (that is, her follower’s) organization stands above all this (“will not dignify by entering”). Then she goes in for the psychological kill: “bloated and meaningless news” that keeps us “disconnected both from reality and its meaning.” At this point, most readers would be subconsciously and consciously convinced that John Hammell is involving us in “turf wars,” “keeping us disconnected” from reality by distorting the facts and distracting everyone with “bloated and meaningless” news.
Finally, here is the psychological lead-out that puts people into their “comfort zone” knowing that what she has stated above is right and just:
“Read, study, follow the links and make sure that you are comfortable with both what is presented and what is concluded from that. Above all, question your sources and evaluate the answers carefully. I know that I do.
“You won’t always be correct, but you can always be informed. If you are an American, Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers gave you that opportunity and obligation.”
If people were feeling at all uncomfortable with her subtle attack on Hammell, this puts their minds at ease. Acting as if she had presented unbiased information, she uses the psychologically-charged words and phrases “comfortable,” “question your sources,” and “evaluate the answers carefully.” Then confirming that her audience is intelligent, she reminds them that they “won’t always be correct” but can “always be informed.” Last but not least, she invokes Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers giving us the “opportunity and obligation” to be informed.
In a similar article using similar psychological techniques, Dr. Laibow convinces readers, using psychologically-charged words such as “forces,” “intentional disinformation,” “misleading,” and “irrelevant” to convince her readers that attempting to stop the multinational treaty process is a waste of time, that instead they need to focus on changing the Codex regulations. Here’s are some excerpts:
“FTAA and CAFTA are really bad ideas for US interests. But all the recent focus in them as related to the CODEX issue because they contain CODEX language is either an error in the understanding of the real nature of the CODEX problem or, worse yet, intentional disinformation to drain off energy and political force from opposition to CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. FTAA and CAFTA are totally irrelevant to the CODEX issue.”
“Some people in the CODEX arena are now focusing on FTAA and CAFTA and saying that it is a waste of time to focus in CODEX because FTAA and CAFTA contain CODEX language in their text. These forces are either using mis- or dis- information by misleading people to think that because these trade agreements contain CODEX language they somehow are a significant part of the Codex problem.”
Dr. Laibow does not reveal that the many Codex committees are all controlled by the multinational agricultural and pharmaceutical companies, so that it is precisely what she is telling people to do – trying to change the Codex regulations – is fruitless. She does not reveal that the Codex regulations themselves, without multinational agreements such as FTAA and CAFTA in place, are just pieces of paper that lack any power.
These are masterful uses of Semantic Differential. Many orators and politicians have mastered this kind of psychological use of words without learning it from Army Intelligence, but one can only wonder where a naturopathic doctor such as Dr. Laibow might have learned to write in this fashion. Perhaps it was from working with her husband, General Albert Stubblebine, former head of the US Army Intelligence & Security Command (INSCOM) 1981-84. Anyone in that position would be steeped in knowledge about psychological warfare techniques and especially about the use of Semantic Differential.
While Dr. Laibow’s activism against the extreme excesses of the pharmaceutical industry appear to be genuine, one can only wonder why she is so intent on marginalizing those who want people to make the connection between Codex and the efforts by these same multinational corporations to enforce the Codex regulations and to place jurisdiction for that enforcement outside of Congress through multinational agreements such as WTO, CAFTA, and FTAA.
Jonathan Campbell
November 4, 2005
References:
Dr. Laibow’s messages and Dr. Laibow’s messages
Reference on Albert Stubblebine: www.mindcontrolforums.com/hambone/people1.html
Here is the lying Dr Laibow's response:
The TRUTH is our Defense…
Confused About the Natural Solutions Foundation?
That's Exactly What the Other Side Wants!
The fact remains that Dr Laibow is a lying piece of garbage.
Only a lying piece of garbage could possibly take such a strong stand against me for trying to post one simple link to a blog entry that I wrote advising people that voting for any incumbent politician for President was against their best interests. The worst that could have happened if I had been allowed to post that link on Dr Laibow's Yahoo group is that a handful of people might have looked at it. There is an even slimmer chance that my blog entry may have convinced anyone to change their mind a month before the election and vote against Obama and McCain.
So, no matter what Dr Laibow says in her defense, this proven liar is not to be believed. Dr Laibow would have us believe that she is looking out for our best interests by doing her thing with Codex Alimentarius to preserve our access to the vitamin supplements we need to help our autistic children. Yet, she adamantly refuses to allow me to post one bit of information that opposes the same politicians who will allow those supplements to be banned. By banning my opposition to those politicians, Dr Laibow, in essence took a stance in favor of banning those supplements and preventing us from curing our children of autism. By such vile action, Dr Rima Laibow advertised to the world that she is a lying scoundrel who is trying to harm our autistic children with her devious misinformation.
Here's some information on her husband, Gen Stubblebine.
And, here's my exchange of emails with the lying Dr Laibow where she now threatens to sue me:
No, you blogged disinformation which is actionable as both slander and liable. I am curious to know just what makes you think that what you have published IS the truth? Have you seen a single shred of information which substantiates a single one of those accusations? Please be advised that you might want to think again before you continue to present material which is, rather than the truth, blatant lies since that means that you, too, are engaging in slander and liable and are opening yourself to the same legal action that the perpetrators of these lies are. Before you make that mistake, why not write to the perpetrators and ask for the documentation that their absurd assertions rest upon. You will find that there are none.
I am so sorry that you have been misled by disinformation, but that is what has happened.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
***Note here how Dr Laibow tries to avoid the fact that I determined she was a lying sack of dung because she refused to allow the truth about corrupt politicians to be published on her Yahoo group. Instead, she threatens to sue me about things other people wrote about her. This is a ploy used by liars all the time to avoid the truth about themselves.***
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 9:30 AM, bettwice33@juno.com
Thanks for your email. I blogged the truth about you. Fuck you.
http://hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008/12/pure-bullshit-dr-rima-laibow-lying.html
I'll note here that every email I get from Dr Laibow begs for money and tries to sell me some coffee for $50 a pound. With Maxwell House costing me $2.99 a pound, Dr Laibows coffee seems a bit overpriced.
This is the piece that it appears the lying Dr Laibow is responding to:
Why does Dr. Rima Laibow use psychological warfare techniques?
<<< Back to Codex
When Dr. Rima Laibow first suddenly appeared on the anti-Codex landscape as leader of the newly-formed Natural Solutions Foundation, I began to wonder where she was coming from. Although she seemed to have a straightforward, hands-on approach to internet activism, something seemed to be amiss.
Long-term anti-Codex activist John Hammell had clearly identified the transnational treaties such as WTO, FTAA and CAFTA as integrating Codex language, placing jurisdiction outside of U.S. lawmakers. Yet Dr. Laibow not only ignored this connection, but actively dissuaded her growing community of online supporters from paying any attention to it, especially at the time when CAFTA was being debated in Congress and there was a real possibility of defeating it. (More on this dissuasion below.)
Then I learned that Dr. Laibow was suing Kevin Miller, allegedly for her having provided some funding for his brilliant and powerful video on Codex called “We Become Silent” but, apparently against her wishes, his including the connection to the above-mentioned treaties.
Since then she has engaged her online community in what appears to be a good cause - writing and calling Congress to stop BioShield 2, a truly horrific proposed law. But all discussion of Codex appears to be directing people into a useless diversion, writing and sending letters of “support” for an “alternative” to the Codex vitamin guidelines. We as ordinary people have zero impact on this process, since it is being drawn up by bureaucrats in the Codex delegations whose allegiance is primarily to the pharmaceutical industry. So getting people involved in this process is a wholesale waste of time.
Then I looked carefully at a message she sent to her supporters about Codex several months ago. In it I found the use of carefully-chosen psychologically-charged words, a technique used in psychological warfare tracts developed at U.S. Army Intelligence by a man named Edward G. Lansdale. This technique, called the Semantic Differential, has been used by our intelligence services widely, as part of programs to subvert “enemy” countries and other targets. (I first read about the Semantic Differential in a tract in Covert Intelligence Information Bulletin about psychological warfare used against Grenada, Chile, and Nicaragua.)
The Semantic Differential is a technique which uses culturally important psychologically-charged words to promote a particular point of view or, in the case of psychological warfare, to discredit an enemy. Here Dr. Laibow’s audience is middle-class, health-conscious, intelligent (and somewhat intellectual) Americans.
Here’s the example from Dr. Laibow’s message:
“If you think that your understanding of Codex is being manipulated by words (such as “risk assessment” as a scientific approach of toxicology appropriate to nutrients which are, by definition, non-toxic, for example), distortion (”CAFTA and FTAA have CODEX language in them so they are the same as the CODEX problem”) and distraction (who is a Druid?, who is a witch?, who is “Controlled Opposition”?, who is a CIA Agent?, who is a good person?, who is a bad person?, etc.”) you are right.”
The psychologically-charged words here are “manipulation,” “distortion,” and “distraction.” John Hammell had made the clear connection between CAFTA and Codex, and had accused the Natural Solutions Foundation (Dr. Laibow’s group) and several other organizations of being “controlled opposition groups” – groups taken over by, or owned by, people who appear to be opposed to Codex but who promote useless activism or tell people that there is nothing to worry about. In the above message, Dr. Laibow psychologically marginalizes Hammell’s position, not by refuting it, but by merely using words that do so by their psychological power in our culture among her audience.
Here is another even more dramatic example, from the next paragraph in her message:
“So the infighting and turf wars which have provided this distortion and distraction (and which the Natural Solutions Foundation will not dignify by entering since there is plenty of turf to go around in the world of health freedom) fulfill the role of the bloated and meaningless “news” that keeps us disconnected both from reality and from its meaning.”
Note the lead-in, using the psychologically-charged words “infighting” and “turf wars” before repeating the words “distortion” and “distraction.” She goes on to say that *her* (that is, her follower’s) organization stands above all this (“will not dignify by entering”). Then she goes in for the psychological kill: “bloated and meaningless news” that keeps us “disconnected both from reality and its meaning.” At this point, most readers would be subconsciously and consciously convinced that John Hammell is involving us in “turf wars,” “keeping us disconnected” from reality by distorting the facts and distracting everyone with “bloated and meaningless” news.
Finally, here is the psychological lead-out that puts people into their “comfort zone” knowing that what she has stated above is right and just:
“Read, study, follow the links and make sure that you are comfortable with both what is presented and what is concluded from that. Above all, question your sources and evaluate the answers carefully. I know that I do.
“You won’t always be correct, but you can always be informed. If you are an American, Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers gave you that opportunity and obligation.”
If people were feeling at all uncomfortable with her subtle attack on Hammell, this puts their minds at ease. Acting as if she had presented unbiased information, she uses the psychologically-charged words and phrases “comfortable,” “question your sources,” and “evaluate the answers carefully.” Then confirming that her audience is intelligent, she reminds them that they “won’t always be correct” but can “always be informed.” Last but not least, she invokes Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers giving us the “opportunity and obligation” to be informed.
In a similar article using similar psychological techniques, Dr. Laibow convinces readers, using psychologically-charged words such as “forces,” “intentional disinformation,” “misleading,” and “irrelevant” to convince her readers that attempting to stop the multinational treaty process is a waste of time, that instead they need to focus on changing the Codex regulations. Here’s are some excerpts:
“FTAA and CAFTA are really bad ideas for US interests. But all the recent focus in them as related to the CODEX issue because they contain CODEX language is either an error in the understanding of the real nature of the CODEX problem or, worse yet, intentional disinformation to drain off energy and political force from opposition to CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. FTAA and CAFTA are totally irrelevant to the CODEX issue.”
“Some people in the CODEX arena are now focusing on FTAA and CAFTA and saying that it is a waste of time to focus in CODEX because FTAA and CAFTA contain CODEX language in their text. These forces are either using mis- or dis- information by misleading people to think that because these trade agreements contain CODEX language they somehow are a significant part of the Codex problem.”
Dr. Laibow does not reveal that the many Codex committees are all controlled by the multinational agricultural and pharmaceutical companies, so that it is precisely what she is telling people to do – trying to change the Codex regulations – is fruitless. She does not reveal that the Codex regulations themselves, without multinational agreements such as FTAA and CAFTA in place, are just pieces of paper that lack any power.
These are masterful uses of Semantic Differential. Many orators and politicians have mastered this kind of psychological use of words without learning it from Army Intelligence, but one can only wonder where a naturopathic doctor such as Dr. Laibow might have learned to write in this fashion. Perhaps it was from working with her husband, General Albert Stubblebine, former head of the US Army Intelligence & Security Command (INSCOM) 1981-84. Anyone in that position would be steeped in knowledge about psychological warfare techniques and especially about the use of Semantic Differential.
While Dr. Laibow’s activism against the extreme excesses of the pharmaceutical industry appear to be genuine, one can only wonder why she is so intent on marginalizing those who want people to make the connection between Codex and the efforts by these same multinational corporations to enforce the Codex regulations and to place jurisdiction for that enforcement outside of Congress through multinational agreements such as WTO, CAFTA, and FTAA.
Jonathan Campbell
November 4, 2005
References:
Dr. Laibow’s messages and Dr. Laibow’s messages
Reference on Albert Stubblebine: www.mindcontrolforums.com/hambone/people1.html
Here is the lying Dr Laibow's response:
The TRUTH is our Defense…
Confused About the Natural Solutions Foundation?
That's Exactly What the Other Side Wants!
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
How to Stop Autistic Self Biting II
I wrote something last year about my problems with my son biting himself that drew lots of interest. I notice that many people still read this entry and, I hope, the useful suggestions that people submitted.
It seems I have solved the problem, finally. My son has only had a couple of minor, short-lived instances of biting himself in the past month.
I don't offer my solution as a complete answer for anyone else who has to deal with this nightmare but what helped my son may help others.
We have done 75 rounds of chelation to remove mercury and aluminum which resulted in much improved behavior and mental awareness. Chelation alone did not decrease the biting though. It was not until we began addressing the possibility that the liver needed some help that the biting diminished and is now virtually gone.
For my son, all we added to his supplememnt regimen was more milk thistle, more fish oil, vitamin D, increased vitamin E and acidophilus to control yeast. I found the suggestion to add these supplements amongst a treatment protocol designed to improve liver function for those with cirrhosis. There was much more to it as designed for cirrhosis so I added one supplement at a time until the behavior seemed to diminish. It worked. So, I offer this as a possible problem to address that should be checked with an MD to determine which supplements may be most likely to improve liver function to a point that will relieve the child of some pain and resolve the biting problem.
It seems I have solved the problem, finally. My son has only had a couple of minor, short-lived instances of biting himself in the past month.
I don't offer my solution as a complete answer for anyone else who has to deal with this nightmare but what helped my son may help others.
We have done 75 rounds of chelation to remove mercury and aluminum which resulted in much improved behavior and mental awareness. Chelation alone did not decrease the biting though. It was not until we began addressing the possibility that the liver needed some help that the biting diminished and is now virtually gone.
For my son, all we added to his supplememnt regimen was more milk thistle, more fish oil, vitamin D, increased vitamin E and acidophilus to control yeast. I found the suggestion to add these supplements amongst a treatment protocol designed to improve liver function for those with cirrhosis. There was much more to it as designed for cirrhosis so I added one supplement at a time until the behavior seemed to diminish. It worked. So, I offer this as a possible problem to address that should be checked with an MD to determine which supplements may be most likely to improve liver function to a point that will relieve the child of some pain and resolve the biting problem.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Tom Daschle Asks for Help
Tom Daschle asked me to host a community meeting to help the Obama administration learn how to fix healthcare. So, I decided to ask the autism community to let Mr Daschle hear our concerns on a blog. That way, we have a public record of it and don't have to take notes with shorthand.
While any issue regarding healthcare is open here, Mr Daschle specifically mentioned looking at prevention, and managing chronic care. Many of us share the same opinions about how to prevent autism and other vaccine induced neurological horrors and some may also be able to help the Obama administration come up with effective policies on managing long-term care. I'll leave it at that and hope some people will comment for Mr Daschle. For purposes of understanding who is commenting, there will be no anonymous comments allowed, pick some sort of name please.
While any issue regarding healthcare is open here, Mr Daschle specifically mentioned looking at prevention, and managing chronic care. Many of us share the same opinions about how to prevent autism and other vaccine induced neurological horrors and some may also be able to help the Obama administration come up with effective policies on managing long-term care. I'll leave it at that and hope some people will comment for Mr Daschle. For purposes of understanding who is commenting, there will be no anonymous comments allowed, pick some sort of name please.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Please Vote for Autism Reform Act
Here's the link to the page below on Change.gov. It would be nice if enough people voted for this to knock an inane idea like mandating that Esperanto be taught in schools out of the top spot. You have to register, then respond to an email that they send you to vote.
Accept and Sign " The Autism Reform Act of 2009"
As a country we have watched Autism Spectrum Disorders grow in a devastating number. Over the last decade it has spiraled so quickly out of control that: 1.) There must not just be one person but an ENTIRE U.S. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE for Educating Children with Autism. 2.) The use of Time Out Rooms, Corporal punishments, Restraints, and the high amount of Abuse must be monitored with severe penalties to states and fines or conviction of those that break such a REFORM Law. 3.) School Districts/States must each have an " Office of Autism Education Compliance or be subject to loss of Federal Funding. 4.) Due Process Hearing Officers must NOT be employees of the state and shall be employed by the Federal Government ONLY. 5.) Insurance companies MUST provide the Early Interventions such as ABA Discreet Trial at no cost to parents. 6.) Protection and Advocacy MUST be funded properly to allow parents that need help get it without any more then a 15 day waiting period.7.) Grants for research, education, and non profit organizations for those with Autism Spectrum Disorders must be made in the amount of 5 billion dollars.8.) Relief for parents who have paid out of pocket to educate their children must be made swiftly with 100% reimbursement. 9.) Behavior Intervention Plans must accompany all Individual Education Plans.10.) Insurance companies must make available all resources for children and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders including but not limited to any items deemed necessary by the physician for the treatment of metal toxicities and any other theraputic orders their physician may order. 11.) The Autism Reform Act shall consider all Autism Spectrum Disorders including Aspergers. 12.) This Reform Act must be 'open' for additions as needed and create a 12 parent panel to propose such additions.
- Michael Robinson (Founder The Office of Advocacy) Dec 09 @ 01:40AM PST
Accept and Sign " The Autism Reform Act of 2009"
As a country we have watched Autism Spectrum Disorders grow in a devastating number. Over the last decade it has spiraled so quickly out of control that: 1.) There must not just be one person but an ENTIRE U.S. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE for Educating Children with Autism. 2.) The use of Time Out Rooms, Corporal punishments, Restraints, and the high amount of Abuse must be monitored with severe penalties to states and fines or conviction of those that break such a REFORM Law. 3.) School Districts/States must each have an " Office of Autism Education Compliance or be subject to loss of Federal Funding. 4.) Due Process Hearing Officers must NOT be employees of the state and shall be employed by the Federal Government ONLY. 5.) Insurance companies MUST provide the Early Interventions such as ABA Discreet Trial at no cost to parents. 6.) Protection and Advocacy MUST be funded properly to allow parents that need help get it without any more then a 15 day waiting period.7.) Grants for research, education, and non profit organizations for those with Autism Spectrum Disorders must be made in the amount of 5 billion dollars.8.) Relief for parents who have paid out of pocket to educate their children must be made swiftly with 100% reimbursement. 9.) Behavior Intervention Plans must accompany all Individual Education Plans.10.) Insurance companies must make available all resources for children and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders including but not limited to any items deemed necessary by the physician for the treatment of metal toxicities and any other theraputic orders their physician may order. 11.) The Autism Reform Act shall consider all Autism Spectrum Disorders including Aspergers. 12.) This Reform Act must be 'open' for additions as needed and create a 12 parent panel to propose such additions.
- Michael Robinson (Founder The Office of Advocacy) Dec 09 @ 01:40AM PST
Thursday, December 04, 2008
Talk to President Obama, Change.gov
Here's a chance to tell Obama about the horror of autism. Someone here is moderating comments so, at least we know they are reading them. This is an opportunity to flood this site with comments about how we are curing our autistic children and to ask Obama to stop the poisoning of our babies.
Monday, December 01, 2008
Autism Ripoff, Dr Kurt Woeller
Here's the link to Dr Woeller's site. As you can see below, for almost $500, you can look at Woeller's site.
Group Status: Open to All
Membership Criteria: None
Full Access Membership: $37.00 per month or $397.00 per year paid in advance
New Full Member Fee (one time): $97.00
Woeller seems to have it all figured out on his website for us so that he can have the site take care of the patients for him while he pockets $500. You can download prescription forms and all you have to do is bring it to a real live doctor for a signature. Of course, you have to pay the live doc for an office visit, maybe $80 for the minute it takes him to sign the form plus the cost of the prescription or lab work. Meanwhile, Woeller has your $500 for letting his site direct you to a live doctor. I wonder if I could find a live doctor by looking in the Yellow pages for less money?
I usually go here without paying $500 for the same information, maybe better. It would cost me $134 just to look at anything Woeller has to say to find out what kind of protocol he advises for chelation. So, I can't say if his advice is any good or not. It doesn't look like you can pay for Woeller's advice by having an insurance company pay for your membership to his site so it's probably much cheaper to see an actual live doctor who insurance might pay for. The last time I saw a DAN doctor, I think it cost me $300 but he could sign prescriptions in person and tell me what I needed to know without having to go see someone else at greater expense later.
Kurt Woeller, you're a real fucking humanitarian, aren't you? Wow, only $500 to learn what we can find for free all over the internet...dirtbag.
Someone came here to defend Dr Woeller. Some simple arithmetic shows that if he enlisted as many members as the Autism Mercury group (almost 8,000), Dr Woeller could grab himself about $800,000 just for allowing people to join his site. That does not include the monthly fees. That does not sound like a humanitarian motive to me.
Group Status: Open to All
Membership Criteria: None
Full Access Membership: $37.00 per month or $397.00 per year paid in advance
New Full Member Fee (one time): $97.00
Woeller seems to have it all figured out on his website for us so that he can have the site take care of the patients for him while he pockets $500. You can download prescription forms and all you have to do is bring it to a real live doctor for a signature. Of course, you have to pay the live doc for an office visit, maybe $80 for the minute it takes him to sign the form plus the cost of the prescription or lab work. Meanwhile, Woeller has your $500 for letting his site direct you to a live doctor. I wonder if I could find a live doctor by looking in the Yellow pages for less money?
I usually go here without paying $500 for the same information, maybe better. It would cost me $134 just to look at anything Woeller has to say to find out what kind of protocol he advises for chelation. So, I can't say if his advice is any good or not. It doesn't look like you can pay for Woeller's advice by having an insurance company pay for your membership to his site so it's probably much cheaper to see an actual live doctor who insurance might pay for. The last time I saw a DAN doctor, I think it cost me $300 but he could sign prescriptions in person and tell me what I needed to know without having to go see someone else at greater expense later.
Kurt Woeller, you're a real fucking humanitarian, aren't you? Wow, only $500 to learn what we can find for free all over the internet...dirtbag.
Someone came here to defend Dr Woeller. Some simple arithmetic shows that if he enlisted as many members as the Autism Mercury group (almost 8,000), Dr Woeller could grab himself about $800,000 just for allowing people to join his site. That does not include the monthly fees. That does not sound like a humanitarian motive to me.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Dr Moulden's Challenge to Paul Offit and Other Child Abusers
I think this challenge should be sent to every doctor who gives vaccines and causes autism.
$10,000 CHALLENGE IS NOW DR. MOULDEN’S “LIFE AND LIBERTY” CHALLENGE
Dr. Carley has offered a $10,000 reward for any vaccine promoter to come on her internet radio show and refute the documents she has authored. No one has stepped forward to do so. Dr. Carley has been qualified in court as an expert witness in VIDS, Legal Abuse Syndrome, Vaccinology, and child abuse.
Dr. Carley’s challenge is now buttressed with Dr Moulden’s proof causation of vaccine induced brain injury, and the mechanism(s) of action in physiology, that has been causing the adverse health consequences from vaccines.
Dr. Moulden, who also subscribes to the Hippocratic Oath of “first do no harm”, now stands beside Dr. Carley and issues the following challenge to the medical experts:
“I am so confident of the cause-effect mechanisms I can now see, and show, which proves brain injury within several hours (sometimes days and weeks) of vaccination, that I offer my life and liberty if I am shown to be wrong…I have no fears, because I am right, and now I can let you see the truth with your own eyes.”
Will any of the “vaccines are entirely safe” experts accept this challenge? Some have said “infants can handle upwards of 10,000 vaccines safely.”
If Dr. Paul Offit (a vaccine expert) is so 100% confident that the vaccines are so safe, for so many people, then the public should demand that he face-off, in public forum, with Dr. Moulden (a brain and neurodevelopment expert). In a 60 minute “show-down” let the public decide the truth for themselves and let the public decide what to do with the one who was/is lying and/or is wrong. You will KNOW the truth within the first half-hour.
$10,000 CHALLENGE IS NOW DR. MOULDEN’S “LIFE AND LIBERTY” CHALLENGE
Dr. Carley has offered a $10,000 reward for any vaccine promoter to come on her internet radio show and refute the documents she has authored. No one has stepped forward to do so. Dr. Carley has been qualified in court as an expert witness in VIDS, Legal Abuse Syndrome, Vaccinology, and child abuse.
Dr. Carley’s challenge is now buttressed with Dr Moulden’s proof causation of vaccine induced brain injury, and the mechanism(s) of action in physiology, that has been causing the adverse health consequences from vaccines.
Dr. Moulden, who also subscribes to the Hippocratic Oath of “first do no harm”, now stands beside Dr. Carley and issues the following challenge to the medical experts:
“I am so confident of the cause-effect mechanisms I can now see, and show, which proves brain injury within several hours (sometimes days and weeks) of vaccination, that I offer my life and liberty if I am shown to be wrong…I have no fears, because I am right, and now I can let you see the truth with your own eyes.”
Will any of the “vaccines are entirely safe” experts accept this challenge? Some have said “infants can handle upwards of 10,000 vaccines safely.”
If Dr. Paul Offit (a vaccine expert) is so 100% confident that the vaccines are so safe, for so many people, then the public should demand that he face-off, in public forum, with Dr. Moulden (a brain and neurodevelopment expert). In a 60 minute “show-down” let the public decide the truth for themselves and let the public decide what to do with the one who was/is lying and/or is wrong. You will KNOW the truth within the first half-hour.
Saturday, November 08, 2008
Friday, November 07, 2008
Lori Warner, PhD, Helps Illuminati Abuse Autistic Kids
Lori Warner PhD, Director of the HOPE Center for Autism is featured here to show off how ignorant she is about treatments that can cure autism. This stupid bitch tries to tell us that ABA has been found to be the gold standard amongst evidence based autism treatments. She thinks the whole world is stupid and that nobody will call her for presenting this bullshit that hurts autistic children.
Lori Warner, you are a lying piece of shit. Nobody who claims to be any sort of expert on autism can not possibly be unaware that we are now curing autism by addressing the cause, vaccines. Promoting ABA as any sort of standard for treating autism is just plain stupid. All ABA can do is torture higher functioning children into improving some behaviors. It can not help anyone with low functioning autism and you know it.
As evidence of how ridiculous ABA is for low functioning autism, I'll tell you how one of the most esteemed ABA people where I live provided some stupid advice. This guy came into my house to try to help us solve my son's problems with biting himself. My son would bite his hands, scream, sometimes for hours, and make himself bleed. The ABA guy told us to say, "Sam, no biting" and walk away. That was his solution. When I asked this "expert" if we should wait until Sam started drawing blood with his biting to intervene, the ABA "expert" did not have an answer.
Sam continued to bite. As expected, saying "Sam, no biting" had no effect on this child who was screaming in pain while he bit himself. That's what ABA is, pure bullshit.
We seem to have solved Sam's biting problems by using chelation to remove mercury and aluminumm from his brain as well as taking steps to heal his liver so the liver can work at full throttle to heal the rest of the damage caused by vaccines.
An autism expert like our Lori Warner, PhD should be aware of these advancements in treating autism. What the hell did they teach this broad in school? I suppose she believes autism is genetic and that shooting mercury and aluminum into infants is a good idea. That's what the Illuminati, who controls ABC where I found Lori's idiotic video would like the public to believe. The Illuminati wants the public to remain ignorant about how vaccines cause autism and all sorts of other problems so they allow dumb broads like Lori Warner to go on TV and drum up business for their outrageously overpriced clinics that waste parents' time and money but do nothing to cure autism.
Lori is able to add an ABC spot to her resume to make naive parents think she knows what she's talking about and she can probably swindle a few more parents to try her clinic. The Illuminati is happy because they will prevent parents from curing autism with this misinformation. Vaccine damaged kids lose again because these bastards refuse to tell the public about the kids who have already been cured with biomedical treatments.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Natural Solutions Foundation Advocates Poisoning Babies
Dr Rima Laibow of the Natural Solutions Foundation owns a Yahoo group called No Forced Vaccinations where the topics are supposedly restricted to discussion about laws and actions that force vaccines on people. However, Dr Laibow censors posts from people who try to point out how presidential candidates will usurp our freedom in this area.
While most Americans will vote for either McCain or Obama today, there are other candidates who are much less likely to force us to be vaccinated. It is in our best interest to be informed about this matter but Dr Laibow is vehemently opposed to anyone sharing this information on her group that is allegedly against forced vaccinations. Dr Laibow freely allows people to discuss intellectually challenging issues, such as the value of wearing underwear but will not allow information to be presented that might help us elect the best candidate for the highest office in the United States.
Since our country has been run exclusively by Democrats and Republicans and Dr Laibow censors opinions that oppose those political parties who proliferate the poisoning of our children, Dr Laibow, in effect, condones the continued poisoning of babies worldwide. When either McCain or Obama take office and refuse to ban thimerosal worldwide, every parent of a child who becomes autistic should write to Dr Laibow and thank her personally for helping to bring the joy of autism into their lives by her censorship of opinions about those corrupt politicians.
Thank you, Dr Laibow.
While most Americans will vote for either McCain or Obama today, there are other candidates who are much less likely to force us to be vaccinated. It is in our best interest to be informed about this matter but Dr Laibow is vehemently opposed to anyone sharing this information on her group that is allegedly against forced vaccinations. Dr Laibow freely allows people to discuss intellectually challenging issues, such as the value of wearing underwear but will not allow information to be presented that might help us elect the best candidate for the highest office in the United States.
Since our country has been run exclusively by Democrats and Republicans and Dr Laibow censors opinions that oppose those political parties who proliferate the poisoning of our children, Dr Laibow, in effect, condones the continued poisoning of babies worldwide. When either McCain or Obama take office and refuse to ban thimerosal worldwide, every parent of a child who becomes autistic should write to Dr Laibow and thank her personally for helping to bring the joy of autism into their lives by her censorship of opinions about those corrupt politicians.
Thank you, Dr Laibow.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Harvard Finds Cause of Alzheimer's
Genuises at Harvard Medical School announced that they were on the cusp of a rare scientific moment when they figured out that the APO-E4 gene is one of the causes of Alzheimer's disease.
These brilliant scientists analyzed genes from over 1,300 families to reach their earth shattering conclusion. However, they claim they have not figured out what the new gene does.
Too bad they never bothered reading what Dr Donald Miller taught us four years ago about the APO-E4. They could have even read this blog to learn the same information and saved themselves lots of trouble. I can't count how many times I've referenced Dr Miller's information about the APO-E4 in the last four years.
Hey Harvaaahd, the presence of the APO-E4 means that that person can not rid themselves of poisons in vaccines, poisons like mercury and aluminum. If they have the APO-E3, they are able to rid their bodies of half of those metals and, genuises, if they have the APO-E2 version, they can dump all of the metals quickly.
Next time these dopes from Harvaaahd want to know something about Alzheimer's, somebody please tell them to check with a parent of an autistic child. Because, Harvaaahd genuises, autism and Alzheimer's are caused by the same damn thing, thimerosal. We even know how to help these people with the APO-E4 avoid Alzheimer's. Stop shooting the old folks up with thimerosal in their flu shots.
And Harvaaahd, you can remove that mercury and aluminum from the old folks' brains with ALA chelation. So, instead of bothering with analyzing 1,300 more families, just give me a call and I'll save you the cost of a study that we already have the answers for.
How can these Harvaaahd guys be so damn ignorant?
Dozens of genes have been linked with Alzheimer's, most notably the APOE4 gene, which clearly raises the risk of developing the disease.
Tanzi's team did a genome-wide association study, using gene chips to check the activity of all human genes among families with Alzheimer's patients and comparing them with families whose members had not developed the disease.
They got the strongest indications from a stretch of DNA on chromosome 14.
"The genetic association of Alzheimer's with this novel chromosome 14 gene, which like APOE appears to influence age of onset, is sufficiently strong to warrant intensive follow-up investigations into its role in the process of nerve cell death in this disease," Tanzi said.
These brilliant scientists analyzed genes from over 1,300 families to reach their earth shattering conclusion. However, they claim they have not figured out what the new gene does.
Too bad they never bothered reading what Dr Donald Miller taught us four years ago about the APO-E4. They could have even read this blog to learn the same information and saved themselves lots of trouble. I can't count how many times I've referenced Dr Miller's information about the APO-E4 in the last four years.
Hey Harvaaahd, the presence of the APO-E4 means that that person can not rid themselves of poisons in vaccines, poisons like mercury and aluminum. If they have the APO-E3, they are able to rid their bodies of half of those metals and, genuises, if they have the APO-E2 version, they can dump all of the metals quickly.
Next time these dopes from Harvaaahd want to know something about Alzheimer's, somebody please tell them to check with a parent of an autistic child. Because, Harvaaahd genuises, autism and Alzheimer's are caused by the same damn thing, thimerosal. We even know how to help these people with the APO-E4 avoid Alzheimer's. Stop shooting the old folks up with thimerosal in their flu shots.
And Harvaaahd, you can remove that mercury and aluminum from the old folks' brains with ALA chelation. So, instead of bothering with analyzing 1,300 more families, just give me a call and I'll save you the cost of a study that we already have the answers for.
How can these Harvaaahd guys be so damn ignorant?
Monday, October 20, 2008
Ralph Nader on Moral Courage
I think the odds are better that Nader will do the right thing for autistic people than what McCain or Obama will do. So, I won't waste my vote on a Democrat or a Republican. Please listen to Ralph Nader and consider who it is that tells you a vote for him is a waste. Democrats and Republicans are behind that propaganda that tells you a vote for Nader is wasted. That's why they won't let him into the debates.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Exciting Propaganda
Maxim Health Systems has a very interesting statement on the billboard they have up at their Flu Shot Clinics.
It says: To receive a flu shot you must not have an allergy to thimerosal (a preservative found in some cleaning products).
I thought someone might find that interesting.
It says: To receive a flu shot you must not have an allergy to thimerosal (a preservative found in some cleaning products).
I thought someone might find that interesting.
Saturday, October 04, 2008
Overthrow The United States Government Now
This is no longer the government of the United States. The United States was not created by the people to poison the children of the people for the profit of the elite people.
The United States government has been poisoning our children for over 20 years with vaccines. In most cases, the mercury in the vaccines just made the children less intelligent. In most cases, this decline in intelligence is a simple matter of mercury from vaccines killing some brain cells, not enough so that anyone would notice. However, in 1 out of 6 children, the damage done by vaccines is enough to warrant a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder(ADD). In 1 out of 150 ( and probably higher) the kids are essentially "brain dead" from the mercury poisoning and earn the diagnosis of autism which means they are completely out of control 24 hours a day and will never progress beyond the mental age of two.
Now, as we see in the video below, Congress has implemented Senate Bill 1959 to restrict our Freedom of Speech as part of the Homeland Security Bill under the guise of fighting homegrown terrorism. The bill did not pass but you will see in the video how it is being implemented.
There is one way to stop this. We have to vote ALL Democrats and Republicans out of office. It is that simple to take back our country.
We have to ban ALL lobbyists. We have to open debates to ALL candidates. We have to allow equal access to the media to ALL candidates so that nobody can buy any election.
The people who have already accepted bribes to gain their seats in office are not going to make these changes. We have the power to throw every one of them out and we have the power to demand honesty and accountability from every person in government. All it takes is to vote the people out of office who have poisoned a whole generation of our children so that none of them will have the brains to ever vote against them. I can only hope that everyone who reads this has the brains to vote against these scoundrels so we can stop the next generation from being poisoned.
If they can poison our children and lie about it, restrict free speech and lie about it by calling it terrorism, what will they do next? It's time to wake up and stop it now. If you don't vote against them, you will have only yourselves to blame. There is no difference between Dem's and Rep's. Please watch the video. Thanks.
The United States government has been poisoning our children for over 20 years with vaccines. In most cases, the mercury in the vaccines just made the children less intelligent. In most cases, this decline in intelligence is a simple matter of mercury from vaccines killing some brain cells, not enough so that anyone would notice. However, in 1 out of 6 children, the damage done by vaccines is enough to warrant a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder(ADD). In 1 out of 150 ( and probably higher) the kids are essentially "brain dead" from the mercury poisoning and earn the diagnosis of autism which means they are completely out of control 24 hours a day and will never progress beyond the mental age of two.
Now, as we see in the video below, Congress has implemented Senate Bill 1959 to restrict our Freedom of Speech as part of the Homeland Security Bill under the guise of fighting homegrown terrorism. The bill did not pass but you will see in the video how it is being implemented.
There is one way to stop this. We have to vote ALL Democrats and Republicans out of office. It is that simple to take back our country.
We have to ban ALL lobbyists. We have to open debates to ALL candidates. We have to allow equal access to the media to ALL candidates so that nobody can buy any election.
The people who have already accepted bribes to gain their seats in office are not going to make these changes. We have the power to throw every one of them out and we have the power to demand honesty and accountability from every person in government. All it takes is to vote the people out of office who have poisoned a whole generation of our children so that none of them will have the brains to ever vote against them. I can only hope that everyone who reads this has the brains to vote against these scoundrels so we can stop the next generation from being poisoned.
If they can poison our children and lie about it, restrict free speech and lie about it by calling it terrorism, what will they do next? It's time to wake up and stop it now. If you don't vote against them, you will have only yourselves to blame. There is no difference between Dem's and Rep's. Please watch the video. Thanks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

